Lawrence Krauss Vs Hamza Tzortzis Video.
Hello, I am new.
Lawrence is generally portrayed as Alpha LII.
But this vid, looks to me like a Te slash versus Ti. Well, maybe I just don't understand socionics.
Just look at it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSwJuOPG4FI
While Krauss want empirical evidence, Hamza is playing The Immanuel Kant game, while occasionaly delivering "Audience Amusing" comment.
So, there's a clash, Lawrence is stating that deductive reasoning is no the infallible one, and Hamza is not focusing so much on information from Krauss, but rather his own "Philosophical, Ontological" etc. Standpoint.
Krauss is trying to distinguish the difference beetwen philosophical "Nothingness" (As the debate topic is "Is Atheism perspective more rational, or is the Islamic one more rational") and the scientific Nothingness. Hamza is often ignoring it, while misapprehension is present in his speeches.
He is generally trying more to play the audience. While Krauss is from the beginning stating that He does not care if he will offends someone's ideas.
He makes a distinction, that He is not trying to offend a person, but rather He wants to ridicule ideas and teach some science.
Anyway, I suggest watching it yourself.
Isn't this Krauss Guy approach more Te than Ti?