You are right. Kant talked about this in his definition of the noumenon as opposed to phenomenon.
Quote:
(Popper is either LII or ILI but damn, he would tear socionics to pieces as unfounded)
Humans are subjective, and there is a study that looks at humans as subjective beings and tries to gain that intersubjective knowledge about them (so things can get predicted): psychology.
I'm just aproximating my big5 results and translating them into both typology systems. I don't think we are at a point where the mind is acessible to science. INTP is close enough aproximation to how and why I behave the way I do.
Quote:
Also: if you look at one of the more popular political goals in history, it is /to increase happiness/ of someone/something/everyone. This happiness can be defined in multiple ways, and there is a lot of 'feelings' involved here. Treating humans as feelings-void is just very delusional and not really addressing reality. The only way to minimize subjectiveness is to: acknowledge feelings are being involved; inspect them logically piece by piece; decide with that knowledge (including feelings in equation or not). This is the only plan that gets you to achieve anything close real detachment.
I know you are a intelligent person and I respect your perspective on the matter, but politics is about power, not about happyness. The average person ofc just wants to live and be happy, but its not the average person in the end who takes power and wields it towards his own ends. People's wants and desires make them easy targets for manipulation. Its how marketing in business works for example. Within politics this makes the mob a useful tool when directed right, which is mostly what is happening.
Quote:
Moreover, people on average tend to be really moved by feelings and knowing their feelings you can predict their (re)actions. How this is useless? This is very real-world based. This is how you get pragmatic solutions.
This would be useful if I were actually trying to convince people of something, but that isn't what I'm after be honest, I'm just criticising because I'm frustated.. In my experience we (myself included) learn best by failing and suffering the consequences. This is necessary in my subjective opinion, so I don't try to convince other people by being diplomatic, understanding and working with my understanding of them in order to arrive at a solution which benefits us both. These things are reserved for my friends and family only. With people I know personally, people I care about I'm quite a different person. I try to be honest as much as possible here, if I were to say that I care about people whom I do not know personally.. I'd be lying to myself.
EDIT: hmm so yeah, I guess you are right in a sense. Feelings matter. They certainly direct my attitude and goals when dealing with people. I stand corrected.
I apologise i shouldn't have dismissed you like that. Sometimes I forget that there is a real person behind a from account, its easy to fall into the trap of just being combative online.

