http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erjzz-YF2N4
Lubov Aksyonova
Antonia Thomas - yes
Printable View
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erjzz-YF2N4
Lubov Aksyonova
Antonia Thomas - yes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_MmHToBrzU
Irina Pudova
Veronica - yes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zZmhkq1vqo
Suki Waterhouse
plays in recent trash "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIHnDiQhGNU
Irina Lachina [on left]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0MMr2k72Sg
Laura Keosayan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWzYzPOlY60
Christina Hendricks
socioniko.net has Dmitry Lytov's listQuote:
Originally Posted by Subteigh
Um interesting choice of videoQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
I thought my speakers were dead for about 20 seconds. grrrQuote:
Originally Posted by msnobody
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsvqgbDnevs
JoJo Fletcher
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLNEnjOQRKs
Essie Davis
the example of ESTP woman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYS_zsJ8dKo
Nonna Mordyukova - ESTP
Debbie Harry - INTP(?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkuGBUFYHuQ
Demi Lovato
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ3fs8t6SjM
Clara Morgane
even weirdleftovers's type is doubtful :)Quote:
Originally Posted by weirdleftovers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlZDjHLrkhM
Klariza Clayton
Watch videos of her with nick jonas. Shes extrovertedQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
I think IEE is more likely
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
Oh look! Another dumb, blonde, bimbo. In Sol-ionics if you are 2/3 you get to be INFp. At least we know who he thinks he conflicts with.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uc3s4PiM-lg
Nadya Suleman
Savannah Brown - S type is more possible
That INFP give you impression of dumbs doesn't contradict to theory, as thinking is not strong part of F types, example of which is your stupid hysterics. :) After turning your seems Fe brain closer to reality, you may also notice similar impressions from other P-F types.Quote:
Originally Posted by wacey
Then. All types are infantile in the region of weak functions. To say that I type by hairs color was especially mindless from your side. :)
You have nothing resonable against the examples are correct. While that you don't like objective reality that many INFP are such as you see, is outside of this theme.
P.S. I saw similar inadequate reaction on examples from the ones which thought themselves as INFP (ENFJ is more probable for you), while their behavior proved the examples are good. :)
Find and post "better" examples. It's the only reasonable thing you may do.
:)Quote:
Originally Posted by msnobody
I'll add another, seems from same asylum as Mira
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGEgI3dKvjc
Karina
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6eFLHtV6h8
Darya Perel
Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by ScarlettLux
Wow, she is so rude and annoying... серьезноQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
Fe valued types lesser refrain from dirty words. Also low culture level of this example.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger tamer
I find quite a few of your "INFPs" annoying and/or wrong, so I didn't bother to watch her. I am trying to balance pitta at the moment. :zen: Apparently it is the season for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
You have an insatiable lust for people watching. I don't have much faith in your typing skills because you claim they are <30-50%. You might not even notice your own duals if they fell out of the sky and landed on you. You seem to have a thing for typing people INFP online. Especially those you dislike or think behave inappropriately, by your standards. You guard your methods and won't share though. :(
For LSE:
But don't fret my pet. It looks like you are not as intuitively wired as you think you are but I already told you that before. I would like to see you post more LSEs so I can get a better sense of who you think you are.Quote:
You are recommended to frequently review your views on various aspects of life, and to put aside any outdated and unworkable traditions and habits. Dry logic of facts should not suppress in you the appreciation of all that is new and unusual. Moderate your conservatism and stubbornness. More often compare yourself to others, cultivate flexibility in your ways of competing.
You tend to rely on your intuition in your assessments of people, not suspecting that you greatly overestimate this ability in yourself and that you are not immune from arriving at erroneous conclusions and prognoses. The consequence of this may be inappropriate or mis-attributed suspicions, and undue harshness in dealing with others, which can put you in an awkward ethical position. Try to have more restraint and tact in such questions.
https://media.giphy.com/media/shwQBGlcPcNnq/giphy.gif
I have common real match with others, based on experiment with bloggers on socioforum. And my typings work in classic Socionics borders ok in my experience.Quote:
Originally Posted by Person
While you don't notice your behavior is closer to Fe valued type than to EII. Similar mistake you have with mostly thinking Fe/Ti types as EII in your examples.
Instead of posting wrong versions which most probably you've taken externally, you'd better posted completely own versions. There are a lot of actors and bloggers to type.
I did not type you by video and hence had no sure opinion about your type, so you could to say "I typed you". Also you may mistake about own type, as do many ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by Starfall
On your photos was non-emotional face which is not common for Fe types, hence there is basis to doubt your type is IEI indeed. And if you don't see similarity of my IEI examples with you - it's argument to doubt in your type too.
When you'll post normal typing material, then there will be possibility to check your type seriously.
Looking at the trend one can easily notice the majority of them are blonde. And who said I dont like objective reality? Projections much?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
Edit(Not as invested in this conversation as it might seem)
Your type is IEI and you think own type as IEI, so you understand good what IEI are. Hence it's expected.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylen
Such things were developed for people with slightly different genome, other meal, other climate. And they are not based on normal experimental basis (science) to be sure they work as said. It's possible to get no good effect or to harm yourself.Quote:
It's about general match between typers. So to trust highly to someones' typing is baseless today.Quote:
I don't have much faith in your typing skills because you claim they are <30-50%.
Subjectively I'm sure in own typings on the moment of posting ~90%. What is my objective accuracy is unknown.
In my lists you saw different types. INFP is just the most interesting for me among the most common types in medias.Quote:
You seem to have a thing for typing people INFP online.
I type random people.Quote:
Especially those you dislike or think behave inappropriately
And as I said befor, to have strong N function is far not enough to type better. :)Quote:
It looks like you are not as intuitively wired as you think you are but I already told you that before.
There are 7 men examples in actors list + 1 blogger. To get my understanding of the type - it's enough.Quote:
I would like to see you post more LSEs so I can get a better sense of who you think you are.
Most are Russians, it's better to input on youtube original Russian notation of names. Sometimes it's useful to make additional search with the addition of "интервью" (interview) to names.
ESFPQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
same as Lindsay Lohan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIkurD710ZE
Claire Boucher
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-1yIZrMMPA
Marina Lizorkina
A lot of talking is one of signes for exrtaversy. There are other important signes like what is talked. While to be sure in E it needs several signes, including nonverbal behavior.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritsa
it's Jungian type! :) now I wait a cookieQuote:
Originally Posted by Starfall
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tII7PrWmrnc
Anna Kalashnikova
IEI are generally feminine in my perception. one of factors to be "sexy"Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylen
if Starfall thinks I know about INFP even lesser than John Snow, it's not importantQuote:
If you disagree it will just make my day. :love:
It's interesting how others will find your incomprehensible Wisdom "foreign to a lot of people"
Wendy James - some introvert (wacey should to yell "dumb, blonde, bimbo")
This song should be posted in the low IQ music thread jeez ... For those who can't understand Russian it's title is "Let me undress you" and the lyrics go smth like "quickly dress me, quickly undress me, let me undress you, let all of my inches love you ....". Shame on you @Sol for posting crap like this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
Anna Kalashnikova is LSI. Her ex-fiance Prohor Shaliapin is IEI. They are not of identical type.
(he kinds of looks like Kurt Cobain in this pic)
http://i.imgur.com/G5JlLr9.jpg
Women of many other types are both feminine and sexy. If they happen to work in the entertainment industry, women of any type, be they LIE, SEI, LSE, or ILE, are encouraged to be sexy - because sex sells and generates money for the industry. Femininity and sex appeal do not equate to being IEI.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
@wacey I'm beginning to see what you mean about Sol's typings. There are sooo many videos of Kalashnikova available on the internet, and he picks the one where she acts like a cheap dumb stripper and types her as IEI.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QqahUAAxhk
Lesya Yaroslavskaya
Surgery and botulinum may affect nonverbal behavior.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylen
Resume: she's close to what I think IEI are, not sure but it's possible.
If you'll get other examples, it's interesting to see them.
Generally I don't pay attention to what actors/singers say in interviews, especially foreign ones.Quote:
You just said your duals do not use vulgar language in another thread or something similar.
EII rarely use "dirty words" compared to Fe types, if she used them in common speaking this reduces the possibility. At least, such situation is among common Russian speakers. In her musical subculture and among English speakes the situation may differ.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqxJ1GZJ1Vo
Natalya Varvina
Anna Beatriz Barros - E, mb ENFJ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAyZtQ9yxs8
Yevgeniya (Devushki Motora)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RvvTt4fk7I
Irena Ponaroshku
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GDgCM8jjF4
Emily Kinney
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EN4Iv2RrctI
Tatiana Maslany
I think SEIQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ntu_DhETWuM
Sati Kazanova
Taylor Kinney is a man (some Se type). This thread is about women.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chae
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xm8rj6L4A4E
Deannie Yip
(she's 65 years there)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX1zDT3AIz4
Emily Mortimer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTDbIY10qdk
Natacha Regnier
Suck are your typing skills :) So shut up... pls, study normal theory, forget Reinin's bs and look what IEI are indeed with my examples!Quote:
Originally Posted by Starfall
You notice IEI differ from you significantly, - that's your problem. Give normal typing materials to type you, get correct opinion about your type, understand this and then your problem will disappear.
Or just post your strange opinion about IEI, if you think it as better.
Generally, I have personal sympathy to IEI women. Problems may appear in close communication.Quote:
Originally Posted by wacey
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7Ouc3NBRYI
Kylie Jenner
It's not good idea to type by such traits of model A, they are too hypothetical and not well expressed. It's more important to check: what functions are weak/strong, in ego (Fe/Fi etc), dichotomies, valued/nonvalued, intertype impressions. The closer you are to Jung's basics - the lesser mistakes you'll do.Quote:
Originally Posted by universe
summerprincess
Connect to our warm company in posting IEI-women examples. Your own typings, not which you saw previously.
Kylie Jenner is emphatically not an Intuitive typeQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
I told you she was fucking IEIQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
So what you're saying is you reject socionics basic model A ideas hmmQuote:
It's not good idea to type by such traits of model A, they are too hypothetical and not well expressed. It's more important to check: what functions are weak/strong, in ego (Fe/Fi etc), dichotomies, valued/nonvalued, intertype impressions. The closer you are to Jung's basics - the lesser mistakes you'll do.
It's useful to watch several clips. Maybe this will change your intuitive impressions.Quote:
Originally Posted by summerprincess
I remember. Also we matched with her type independently, what rises the weight of the version.Quote:
Originally Posted by universe
I reject to think as equal parts of model A wich have different logical and subjective experimental basis. It's not religion and not "holy text" where you should not doubt in every letter of it. Model A is hypothetical still.Quote:
Originally Posted by universe
Some parts of descriptions of how different functions in model A are expressed in the behavior have low basis, compared to what functions are in ego and what relates to aspect, for example. There are better parts of model A to use in typing. And when you'll notice contradiction between, for example, traits of Fi or Se in ego and traits of "Ti mobilizing function" you should choose results of 1st.
The other thing - to notice traits like "Ti mobilizing function" is harder than traits of "Fi in ego" or "Se in ego", even if that hypothesis would be correct.
Tha'ts why on practice for typing I prefer to use only part of model A, which I said above. And same recommend to you. These parts are enough for sure typing. Using of anything else unreasonably will rise the risk to mistake. The example of what leaded you to post non-IEI as example of IEI. If you want the core of theory worked for you good, - it needs to minimize of using doubtful (and lesser clearly seen in behavior) parts of theory and maximum use parts close to Jung.
It's harder for F types to understand such details in theory, where one parts of it should to have more trust and practical use than others. Similarly as befor you had troubles to understand the difference between sure opinion and assumptions, and the difference between degrees of assumptions. It's common to simplify things in weak functions areas by generalization and equalization. Try to understand the levels of theory: where it starts, what are just consequences, where it's clear and where goes far in speculations. To read Jung would be also useful for you.
It just what stood out to me, and she doesn't seem like she Se is something shes naturally good at, she uses it for her videos but fails and doesnt look like shes a natural. I think mobilizing is good for when you have trouble seeing the persons strong functions because he/she is trying hard to be someone else. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
Here's an example of an ILI or SLI trying to be good at Fe or Se or something, and then when he looks back at it and learns hes not that at all ,and you can see his mobilizing Fi now as he comes off very compassionate and hes careful of being immoral or a bad person in his videos (Fi mobiliizing)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9TKWh7Edm8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r5UGThY3yk
Geena Davis
Philip DeFranco - ILIQuote:
Originally Posted by universe
I can feel in him: T, N, valued Fi and introversion. Generally impressions remind other ILI. That's it.Quote:
and you can see his mobilizing Fi
To use in typing much more doubtful part of the model, which uses traits which are harder to notice is senseless. Limit the usage of the theory to more core parts I've listed above and you'll type better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnNC7fW_6Tw
Marguerite Moreau
"Ne dominant" introvert. Now I know. Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVudw11l8X4
Audrey Tautou
I'm using impressions from nonverbality, eye are important for this, but I don't care about their shapes. Most examples are from actors list, some of which are there for >5 years like Marguerite Moreau.Quote:
Originally Posted by universe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwELyyGE5Ls
Olsens
Freelee - ESFJ(?)
would be good if others besides flood also posted IEI examples
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv8vx_SMIJ8
Esther Nubiola
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJkhi2C1zTU
Alexandra Borisova, on left (socionica_club_spb)
wrongly typed by them as EII
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdJA9KFq5Ds
Sofiko Shevarnadze
Dakota Fanning - ENFJ(?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FtiYn2EA5o
Lauren Parsekian
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7S9XCEyeuM
Marta Sobolevskaya
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umaaQyufhxc
Shtukensia (VerussiaBeauty)
this is a better video of herQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkGi6-qm1Do
I activated subtext and translation to try to understand what it was about. It works... only ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritsa
she talks too much for an introvert. thank you for the tipQuote:
Originally Posted by Tigerfadder
Some introverts do. The other day I watched a few interviews of warren buffett which is believed to be a Si lead, introvert. He said that when in public he was quiet but when alone with a trusted friend he could not shut up. That is usually how it can be for introverts at early ages.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritsa
yes trueQuote:
Originally Posted by Tigerfadder
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j928sM-PUYY
Wenche Myhre
lesser than you :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritsa
I'm not like this at all. Why do you keep getting the wrong images of me in your head. I'm quiet and restrained. @applejacks and a whole bunch of forum members met me in person and they wouldn't say that :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
In any case I think that I want to go with EIE final for her and it seems here that she's with LSI (the guy) and final :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zj_pfQXTphY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LsANSkpMnk
Lavika
You have no Fi dominant type and don't notice this too. :) You prefer refuse the basic theory than to assume you are using it wrongly. Because you don't care about truth or use. You play a role, live with fantasies and make senseless chats - that's all you need here and anywhere else. That such behavior with ignoring of the reality may to create problems to other people - you don't care also.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritsa
:bashhead:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvjBwX7YzMI
Polina Grents
sledgehammer is more effectiveQuote:
Originally Posted by Maritsa
I know. They don't have oneQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EsgzMVkhdU
Viktoriya Poltorak
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjrMprYa608
Lily-Rose Depp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yG3VU7zVZbA
Anna Koshmal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvinswOF6xI
Shannyn Sossamon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7YiJ__IlxI
Olesya Rulin
Danielle's "boyfriend" is not SLE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfB-GygMmAw
Elizabeth Daily
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUlUeNbTYnE
Liza Aprelkova
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cI7MTjIGTiY
Nazanin Boniadi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8e-WqEngjgQ
Diletta Leotta
She has such a nice energy around her... or maybe it's because she is beautiful lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
Is this your list or is it a group compilation? Do you consult others on every video?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
http://socion2.narod.ru/celsoclist2_en.htm
nice looking people have nice energy :)Quote:
Originally Posted by summerprincess
It's my outdated list which needs big cleaning. Especially types without galleries. Bloggers list is the only I recommend to use in now moment. I've made cleaning for non-Russian part of men, it's not on the site as I'm planing to update the list more befor uploading.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylen
> Do you consult others on every video?
I don't consult befor posting own opinion. But for some people I saw opinions of others - on forums and other sites, sometimes befor my sure opinion appeared.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTGFeLu5hr0
Clara Henry (tahultsbarn)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7cBOceZ3NM
Tatyana Karetnikova
I do not think she is victim but aggressor.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol
no, shes publicly whiny enough to be Ni ego
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AN-fDp_I3gE
Tatyana (Genius Marketing)
Ni ego do not display whiny. xd They display durability and integrity!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost
Oh, so that's why it's called victim. Makes sense. :8*Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigerfadder
And Se ego is more of accepting reality and can point out the weaknesses of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost
They give in to Ni whininiessQuote:
Originally Posted by Tigerfadder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJWJE0x7T4QQuote:
Originally Posted by Sol
Challengers/Trophies: EIE (ENFj) IEI (INFp)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost
These are the types who unconsciously throw a "gauntlet" down for their opponents. They know on an almost subliminal level exactly who they are looking for, and anyone who does not fit the bill will be subjected to a rather flakey, hot-cold game of courting tag. As a result, they may appear (both to others and to themselves) rather amorphous and can take on qualities of the other romantic attitudes, depending on the situation and who they are "challenging."
They may, for example, give the victim half his aggressor, the psuedo-aggressor a little victim, the caregiver a bit of his child, etc. They react best, however, to those who do not "break" as a result of their games, but grant them a level of autonomy. Healthy examples of this type will have a sense of self-esteem, and may think of themselves as the "prize" that will be given only to the rightful owner.
Aggressors/Employers: SEE (ESFp) ESI (ISFj)
These types, like the conquerors, express their sexuality openly. In daily life they may tend to be rather submissive and as a result may tend to carry over these tendencies into their romantic life. They are won over by indirect acts of submission, and are thrilled when their love interest (in the case of the "psuedo-aggressor" type) acts unlike himself. In a partner, they are looking for their equal - someone whose solid facade they can break down piece by piece.
Thats it, nothing whiny about the gauntlet dropper.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7KU_Pkts4g
Irina Vasilenko
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23zsML5D6N4
Kristen Sarah (hopscotchtheglobe)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qX6Zie39kbc
Anna Kostenko (annetnova)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njWDfOfS2Cw
Margarita Muradova (mycurlysoul)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9-4WqQl0_o
Amanda Holden