Comments such as those recorded here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/t...ve-quotes.html
are of course very much indicative of :Se: , according to pages such as:
http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Vocabulary
edit: (:lol: actually, on reading both, I can very much see :Te:, :Si:, and maybe :Se: to a lesser extent)
I see her very much as a female Jeremy Clarkson (who I happen to agree with a SLE typing), with the exception that Clarkson at least tries to be likeable, and of course Donald Trump (who I also happen to agree with a SLE typing), who is perhaps a more similar comparison. I think she may be too deliberate and sustained in her attitude to be of the EP temperament however (just my impression).
I find her far too energetic to be ESI, and reading about her early life and interests, I would broadly consider EXTX to be more likely. I do agree that many of her infamous statements could be said from a :Si: frame of mind (as :Si: gone wrong) - frequently feeling the need to point out things that discuss her idea of aesthetics, but I find it unlikely for an ESE to do that for a prolonged period of time, as part of a sustained persona. I suspect also a LIE might be unlikely to make such remarks, due to being "weak" (uncertain?) on such matters (e.g. of the flesh, public image etc.), and in general, but I'm not sure.
edit: I am tentatively favouring LSE for her type.