All you ever wanted to be
Someone (I forget who, perhaps Sergei Ganin) once wrote that if you really understand the types, are healthy and self-aware, your true type is precisely the type you'd want to be. The "best" type is your type.
Not in the sense, "I wish I could be XXXx for a moment to be better at XXXx" -- in the sense of actually thinking, consistently, "why do I have to be this type, I wish I was that other type".
I have observed that generally, when people mistype themselves and/or are unhappy with their type, it's because they don't really understand the type.
Re: All you ever wanted to be
Re: All you ever wanted to be
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana
It bothers when I hear about how soft or weak INFjs are - because I don't see myself like that, or don't want to see myself like that perhaps.
Oh, how I agree with this. On the other hand - people often see me as softer and weaker than I am in real life too. "lol lol You're so harmless." :8* (I have no idea why anyone would think of saying such a thing, but it's happened.) So why wouldn't that show in the type description? I think it's the :Se: PoLR. Also, I think beta and gamma are more likely to see us as week. At least that's my experience.