Attachment 3912
Printable View
IS THIS YOU??
(called it first :D)
does it finally fit your mental picture of me?
It's a friend I've typed as ILE-Ti.
. Attachment 3922
I haven't noticed you rocking at VI, but it's nice you find her hot. Sadly I don't think I have profile shots. My friend is quite camera-obsessed and extremely photogenic. Probably Ennea 3 (competitive and image-thirsty as hell), you can't trick her with shots unawares.
My mental picture of you wears less clothes ;)
She's nice looking, don't be so sensitive @William, finding her hot is extremely approperiate :D
I shouldn't have posted those pics. Everyone takes E 5s for expressionless ugly ducklings instead of looking at their deeper motivations. Michelle Pfeiffer, Ralph Fiennes, or Georgia O'keeffe as standard images are out of question. But at least you are around my self-typing area.
Looks SLE to me.
Solaris, this forum is not your personal playground to troll ppl.
Here is a quote you just made in another thread:
Why do you get your bee so much in a bonnet about myself commenting on a person looking German yet here you are yourself talking about your impression of someone else's ethnicity?Quote:
Originally Posted by Solaris
because you were commenting on ethnicity to make a connection between the person in VI pics and the OP in said thread. And this way to "derail" the actual purpose of that thread - which was shedding light on some mistypings and excessive subjectivity around here a bit.
No I wasn't. See this is what I meant by wild accusations. If you want to keep your threads on subject then chill out with that stuff. Seems like reasonable advice to me, be cool :) BTW as a side note - I think this is really interesting stuff though in regards to either your socionic type or your ennea type, how you assume (incorrectly) my motivations and probably others as well.
6w5 cp is obvious.
I had forgotten the sx/so imitation cat in a corner for a while. I'm kind of catalyzed.
I said that it is well-known that you are 6w5. You are acting out in a typical E6 fashion, and have said nothing to make me think that you are indeed E5. I have said that I'm sure you're IJ, And that I suspect you of being ISFj. I don't see what crass mistyping you are imagining. Further to the point, you have said yourself that I am erasonably in line with what you self-type as. So why are you taking such offence?
E6 is laughable, Solaris has as much anxiety as Mercutios micropenis has girth.
you're Fi polr, have no clue about "offence" etc. and last week you were typing me IEI or smth. You'd like me to be E6, yes, for some mysterious reason (I recall you were considering E5 for yourself a while ago - have you even finished your high school studies?). And you seem to take Enneagram very seriously, like a good old Ti creative who cannot read people through other means but ready-made "systemic categorization". Any opinion on my friend's Sociotype btw?
Mercutio has shown no meaningful understanding of either Socionics or enneagram.
Monkey see, monkey do.
That's a really strong argument you've got going there. Funny how you typed me sx first numerous times before with exactly the same avatars :confused2:
Quote:
I wouldn't dislike you so much if I weren't Sx first, don't worry.
Your words, not mine.
Well at least we have two things in common - love of cats and passionate hatred for people..Sometimes you have to work with what you've got.
But back to the VI of your friend, who is very pretty and probably ExTx something.
I only typed you SX first once, when you first came here, made a long vivid post and asked to be typed. I was wrong. I took E3-4 loud glamor style for Sx first. But you may be hot enough, even if you VI right as some of Silke's so/sp typings http://www.pinterest.com/vonsain/sosp/. Being Sx first doesn't have much to do with looking good. All stacks can be attractive. Thanks for expressing an opinion about my friend's type and not making the whole thread *only* about you and your feelings. Btw you could make a poll and ask everyone about your stack, as narc did.