Type? I haven't read much about her type lately. I know a lot of people seem to not like this woman but i think she's great. I feel like we're soulmates.
<3
http://youtu.be/A7LNNwyol3E
Printable View
Type? I haven't read much about her type lately. I know a lot of people seem to not like this woman but i think she's great. I feel like we're soulmates.
<3
http://youtu.be/A7LNNwyol3E
SLE (?)
omfg i hate her so much. she's an idiot gossiper who quite rarely has all the facts. her show is mostly speculations.
I fell asleep to Nancy on the TV. She really annoys me in the same way Bill O'Reilly used to. :lol:
She is being a kinder, gentler version of herself in this video. I wonder if she is a bit scared of 2 Chainz. She usually cannot keep her personal feelings as controlled as she seems to in this video. She appears a little starstruck too. :thinking:
I really don't want to type her the same type as people I know and like but here goes I have considered. ESE, ESI and IEE. Is her Fe demonstrative?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMdogb7NCqk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXcPEKaxJzg
I wonder what her stand on alcohol is. :rolleyes: I don't even like to smoke but her reasoning irritates me.
I think she did watch too much "refer madness" as a child. :shifty:
she claims she's some hero/spokesperson for women but she comes off as annoying asshole, I remember her giving some gay porn star a hard time. She told him 'don't spray perfume on the pig' lol.
I guess her heart is in the right place but the cuntiness is annoying. Plus she dramatizes/exploits other people's tragedy for her own self-image... a pretty low thing to do.
This is an extraverted rational, what she's saying, does and her overall vibe, not SLE at all. Did you even VI her neck, @Maritsa? Clearly a rational. ;)
Don't watch TV like that but I feel she's :Te: base though and :Ni: creative seems more likely than :Si: creative especially if her show is mostly speculations like BB says so possibly ENTj. Apparently some like to type her ESTJ in MBTI. Quadra-wise, doesn't she seem more Gamma than anything else though?
I also was thinking she seemed Te based and could be ENTj with ESTj as the other option.
LSE she's not Ni
I say Beta. I thought EIE or SLE.
I'd love to see her argue with an intelligent ILI. They'd probably embarass her relentlessly. Hopefully.
Te doesn't seem 4D.
In regards to Ni creative, Nancy shows a distinct lack of penetrating insight into the essence of complex internal situations and this makes her a terrible analyst. Further, she avoids public introspection and rarely shows vulnerability or discussion into her own issues and how they effect the opinions she espouses. There is little eloquence and creativity in her principles which more often then not cater to popular public opinion. In promoting her opinions she is forcibly imposing. She does not look for internally contradictory situations, nor does she grasps their essences, nor even attempts to do so. These are modes of cognition that comes naturally and fluently to Ni-creatives. In fact, all these point to a person who is extremely weak in introverted intuition from the episodes I've seen.
She's a snake and she's not even intelligent . I don't know what someone can admire about her .
Her type : Estp or Esfp imo
Shes seems like the type of reptile that would devour her young
i don't know this woman and she does seem a bit square _but_ rewatching that video i realize that the rest of the 4 ladies are the non-sensical ones (at least in this context), like little birds twittering and rubbing each other whereas she considers all options and proposes sth rational and objective like sober data gathering with regards to the deceased's entourage and an AWTAWPSAY
now giving some gay porn star a hard time is def a ticket to hell (still grieving over arpad)
and pls dont forget that we are all cunts
the thing is that her commentors are just as basic as she is (see the young turks) and i guess same goes for their audience
You made me skip through the video again you monster.
I know nothing of the case
The question of "Who gave her drugs" and "who pushed her and let her drown" are atrocious in their obvious implication that someone has. They could only be appropriate without any evidence if the question was about little child who couldn't have possibly gotten the drugs himself or shouldn't have been bathing unsupervised. So she is screaming fire when there is no even smoke for the ratings. The worse forms of scumbag "journalism" retardedly inelegantly executed.
I haven't heard of her before but I imagine part of her success is her notoriety. If she was saying half way uncontroversial or dumbed down views probably wouldn't get the media attention/talk shows etc.
what if ppl like her exist only to make others look less dumb and more legit? is this a scumbag hypothesis?
Yeah everybody needs a villain whom they can exalt their superiority from
I don't admire her, or care about her either way, I only found out about her through this thread, but I acknowledge she's successful in a monetary fashion because of the niche she's carved for herself.
So in the respect of being successful at making money and actually putting herself out there, then yes I think that calls for something to congratulate her for.
journalistic integrity/responsibility does not really end where she starts anyway
NEO
Yeah, but what about sociotype?