@fen you asked for pictures, there you go. Others are also invited of course :).
Please don't quote the pictures.
Attachment 2006Attachment 2007Attachment 2008Attachment 2009
Printable View
@fen you asked for pictures, there you go. Others are also invited of course :).
Please don't quote the pictures.
Attachment 2006Attachment 2007Attachment 2008Attachment 2009
You know you watch too much Supernatural when... eh, nevermind.
I suck at vi but would consider Gamma.
Mercy me, don't make me embarrass myself any further.
Ummm. XNXj... at a guess.
Edit: What is the reason you do not want the pictures quoting? I have seen a few people ask this and i don't understand...genuinely curious.
When they aren't quoted you can erase the if you want to. Thats the reason people do that probably
When i started with socionics i thought i am gamma nowadays i am leaning more towards delta. But by reading more about decisive (se/ni) and judicious (si/ne) i think i might be decisive even though i tend to be lazy. At work i like to finish things before i do something new and the days before tests i am very mobilized thinking all the time at the exams. I also don't feel comfortable before a not unimportant decision and can relax better after the decision is made.
Smoking kills - throw those cigs my way.
All of my irl friends have black squiggle faces too.
Still ESTj or ISTp
I need a better picture of you taken from the side and shoulder up
He is a handsome dude. There are some EIIs here that always make handsome dudes LSEs. I do not know who does that, but somebody does.
However, I guess he could be the Si-LSE. I have no arguments against it.
EIE-Ni
Then i appreciate it a lot that you also respect their privacy
That picture is tho most natural I found. It is also from the side. Normally i always feel tense and don't like it to much when people take picture of me. It's not because of privacy I just tend to feel akward
Attachment 2010
SLI confirm
LSE yesterday.
SLI today (and no word about the switch).
Weird
I was always leaning more towards Si because you kept saying lazy but um, yeah, I've seen only one extremely Si LSE in my life that was slightly lazy, so I was holding out for another lol.
Yeah, the picture clearly indicates SLI over LSE; you can look at the LSE profile shots if you want in the Filatova portraits
I'm just better at VI.
About the laziness many friends wouldn't agree that i am lazy but i think it's only because they are unbelieveble lazy :). What is for sure that i feel better at the end of a day when i was productive. Still there are many days where i am not content with myself because i didn't reach my day-goal e.g. 6 hours learning or attending all lectures.
The reason why i think i am a J and not a P is because I judge information immediately when it's incomming. E.g. Reading a longer Article in a magazine or newspaper i actually all the time judging every section and therefore i am changing my opinion about the article all the time.
I also might be extroverted seeing nobody during a day is hurtfull for me. In groupconversations i am normally one of the most talkatives as long the subject is at least half-interesting. And the smaller the group gets the more likely i influence the subjects that are talked about.
Fe-Role would also fit. I can give an example. We were 5 people playing a quiz game. The atmosphere was lighthearted and funny. A girl had to say a insect that beginns with the letter T and she said tick i invented and didn't want to give her the point because a tick is an arachnoid and not an insect. I know I can be an incurable smart-aleck :). Luckily no one took my intervention to serious but i also know people who would hate me for that.
Edit: And your right my face expression seems to be more similarto the SLIs compared with the LSEs. For me VI is anyway something i probably never get.
I think i may have a side shot for the vi-ing... must remember not to be offended. Meow
EDit: Attachment 2011
how does this photo of a forum ENFp (your supposed dual) make you feel,OP? so close yet so far..
And if you were LSI an IEE would look hot and desirable to you. Cool.
Never really been attracted to EIE on this forum. Blah.
I am not talking about the forum :)
Hmm, I don't think I even met one to begin with. Maybe I did and forgot about it. I don't know about you - you can have some kind of fatal attraction to them.
@Maritsa and what do you say to the stuff i wrote about judging and perceiving?
You said "The reason why i think i am a J and not a P is because I judge information immediately when it's incomming. E.g. Reading a longer Article in a magazine or newspaper i actually all the time judging every section and therefore i am changing my opinion about the article all the time."
That isn't really a product of rationality or irrationality or j/p; anyone can be critical and judgmental of information as it comes in contact with their personal values. My SLI ex was one of the most critical people of women who were not "pure" who were not "virgins" and who slept with many men and didn't commit to a relationship, that didn't make him a j type.
Didn't not make him a p type either; amirite?
right.
My problem at the moment is that i don't truly understand what :Si: is whereas i still can't decide if I value/use :Ti: or :Te: more. I am not in general a harmony seeking person and would say that i can handle disputes and arguments better than others. My father even told me i should go into politics. So i am aware of :Se: but I am not sure if i value it.
I have kind of a ego/id problem. I don't think my PoLR is an intuitive one but either :Fi: or :Fe: leaning more towards :fe: though
From group behaviour and descriptions i identify most with gamma but don't see myself neither as NT nor SF
Please send your skull measurements to thedrphillshow@gmail.com.
It's been a hard night's day so let me just profess my eternal love for you right off of the bat.
And Daft, I still think you're Gamma, although I have nothing to prove that except for much telling tingling in my left elbow which I've come to recognize as an infallible sign.