You can view the page at http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...e-and-the-Self
You can view the page at http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...e-and-the-Self
In my study of binary(2-based) and trinary(3-based) systems, it's seems to be that binary systems lack synthesis, and trinary lacks the a symbol/representation of the unknown or the symbol/representation of null.
This is a very important passage as the 4th component of turning a trinary system into a quaternity is generally the discovery of the unknown.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jung
Generally the structure of a trinary system will be Yes, No, Null(unmeasured, unobserved) or 1, 0, Null. The 4th component that is sometimes added is N/A/Unknown. I think this is the basic structure of the functions as well.
1=Feeling Measurement of Yes (Passion, motivation, feelings, subjectively these exist in a definite fashion)
0=Thinking Measurement of No (Doubt, logic, verification, validation)
Null=Sensing indication of non-observed, if observed and can be measured than see above
Unknown=Intuition Knowledge that information exists but is unknown, observed implicitly but unmeasured
Note this might only apply to static functions, in this fashion and dynamic functions might not be the same.
I think this matches up with Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis as well.
Thesis=Yes
Antithesis=No
Synthesis=Unknown
Anti-synthesis=Null
However by adding nullification or falsification to the equation as a possibility, I'll call it antisynthesis, the thesis and antithesis rather than being reconciled are merely rendered as a meaning question. You can do this by viewing the problem of thesis and antithesis as a language game problem ala Wittgenstein or likely thru other means.
Thanks for adding this, it's very interesting.