What physical features do you find attractive?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

That's quite interesting, I've never heard anyone say before they'd like someone to dress in contrast to their personality.
Could you give some (picture) examples of that (and body language you like) ?

---

I don't find celebrities attractive for some reason so I'll have to look for something that conveys what I mean well, sorry if it ends up being an anime or video game picture. I'll take a look through my Steam library and see if I can find any guys from games that represent what I mean well. I think something like "I'm wearing this because I picked it out and it looks good on me and suits my personality". It is attractive to me because I've always been hand me down fodder and in the past few years I've been wearing things I've picked out and bought, but from time to time I'm still in wearing hand me down mode. I got myself a bunch of new pants, jackets, hoodies, shoes, etc this year and so far so good and I appear more genuine to others I think because I feel like it suits my inner self. Sorry, it might take me a while to find a good picture.

^ I've always liked sociopathic grins, somehow I don't mind them although they are these kind of micro expressions that reveal some kind of flaw (sociopathy)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xoXhfgk3OK...erica%2B28.jpg
I've always thought that photo of Robert Deniro was always a classic sociopathic shit eating grin. I don't know but there should be a caption like "Yea I ate the cake and I'm smiling about it too"

Now for women I'll post something classic American golden age, like champagne or ginger ale.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...3eb3c6c3e4.jpg

Apparently she's from Belgium/Brussels I can sort of tell, she has a bit of that style and petite look to her form and movement. She's "fine" he he ;)

I overall prefer more soft looking people, but it's hard for me to pit point an exact feature that I find attractive. These are my top:
Eddie Vedder :love:
https://s29.postimg.org/p49cz6c93/d5...04b014aaa6.jpg

Mathias Lillmans

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...e5e9def8a0.jpg

Rollo from Vikings

https://media1.popsugar-assets.com/f...oooo-Rollo.gif

Jay Smith

https://s29.postimg.org/uv44qn9mv/10...05022507_n.jpg

Varg Vikernes :D

https://s28.postimg.org/7nmauemfh/8c...b7b11b7047.jpg

Face paint.


I wish it was acceptably fashionable worldwide, instead of just being a celebrity gimmick, or animation trope. It'd be very enjoyable to see people everyday, with their unique takes on it. It has much more expressive and creative potential than nail polish, lipstick or facial hair (beard styles and so on).

http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/...20130819094354
http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/...20150212104910
http://www.edfilmfest.org.uk/pub/img...ault.13035.jpg
http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/...20111021004147
http://media.animevice.com/uploads/1...0015_large.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...derschvank.JPG
http://www.jimkeefe.com/blog/wp-cont...1/mononoke.jpg
http://orig08.deviantart.net/d0db/f/...iousmerlin.jpg
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2...edge-cover.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...f50af90df1.jpg
http://s.jeban.com/userfiles/uploads...4/03%20(2).jpg

Robert Redford (young)

http://i.imgur.com/iEz59bG.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/dqU4yoy.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/5JQ6Ryv.jpg

Be reasonably healthy and naked,Is porn allowed on here?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Told Ya

Be reasonably healthy and naked,Is porn allowed on here?

---

Nope, no porn but you can kind of NSFW stuff that borders the line of art and porn.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Told Ya

Be reasonably healthy and naked,Is porn allowed on here?

---

No penetration, and ideally no genitalia either.
Butt and breasts seem to be fine.

Basically, only "softcore" stuff at most.

 

Attachment 9321Attachment 9320Attachment 9322

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

No penetration, and ideally no genitalia either.
Butt and breasts seem to be fine.

Basically, only "softcore" stuff at most.

---

So we're only to post images of the Biblical angels that lack genetalia?

I imagine them as beautiful..

white

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

This is kind of embarrassing to admit...
But Enrique Iglesias.

http://i.imgur.com/Xhmyrv1.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/aFZ9bGY.jpg

 

http://i.imgur.com/DEb4Mwo.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/rrPzjBA.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/NigMFcE.jpg

---

Lol that's normal ;) He's a cutie (looks and personality). I had a crush on him when younger too :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Within

So we're only to post images of the Biblical angels that lack genetalia?

I imagine them as beautiful..

---

or change genitalia?

This is so similar to one of the angelic creatures that has been in my dreams since childhood. I always feel an overwhelming sense of love for them (the angelic creatures). <3

http://off.net.mk/files/styles/stati...t.mk-10192.jpg

I tried making my character as attractive as possible on skyrim with mods and this is what I got.




http://www167.lunapic.com/do-not-lin...205?3304153438

Michael Jackson... Haha yeah, bear with me. :p

Off The Wall Era

http://i.imgur.com/UOCkw8T.jpg

 

http://i.imgur.com/oETA7t7.gif

http://i.imgur.com/lhzSTZ8.gif

 

Those gold pants/that gold suit were everything, not gonna lie... :lol:

http://i.imgur.com/9RZuW9g.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/Uwh5D6l.jpg

RIP.

Lookin' soft & cute

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...78f430c37d.jpg

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...256ae781a4.jpg

Very introverted features, laxness, delicacy. Fragility, even. Takes everything in as opposed to radiating. Can be genderqueer ~<3

Example: Matthew Clavane. Can someone type this image?

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...d6b78793fe.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

Very introverted features, laxness, delicacy. Fragility, even. Takes everything in as opposed to radiating. Can be genderqueer ~<3

Example: Matthew Clavane. Can someone type this image?

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...d6b78793fe.jpg

---

Introvert, Feeler, close split between Ni and Se, but leaning toward Ni. Probably IEI, possibly EII.

You're a long way from home, @Chae.

You sure that this guy doesn't appeal more?

Attachment 9523

wow he looks like soko

http://dazedimg.dazedgroup.netdna-cd.../2/1182796.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

Introvert, Feeler, close split between Ni and Se, but leaning toward Ni. Probably IEI, possibly EII.

You're a long way from home, @Chae.

You sure that this guy doesn't appeal more?

Attachment 9523

---

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...673a5abcb0.gif

YOU'RE INTERFERING IN MY ROMANTIC BUSINESS AGAIN HRRGHH NOT TODAY SATAN DON'T YOU NOTICE I WANT TO BE AN SLE SO BAD

Why do you push me to dualize properly anyway... are you Hitch? :lol:

Clint Eastwood's personality sucks so I ignore his looks heh

Try again when you have more :Fi:.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

Lookin' soft & cute

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...78f430c37d.jpg

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...256ae781a4.jpg

---

@Adam Strange On the other hand. While you are hooked, challenge: type these as well :3

Clint Eastwood's personality does suck. But his face is fairly typical of SLI's, although most SLI faces today will be more full.

Just sayin', @Chae. I'm not saying you aren't IEE, but you are slightly different from the IEE's that I know. I can't put my finger on it, exactly, but a bit different.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

@Adam Strange On the other hand. While you are hooked, challenge: type these as well :3

---

These are harder. I will say that there is no trace of SLI in the guy's face. Those eyes. He is too soft and victimy. Might be another IEI.

The woman is Beta victim. No one else could carry off that hairstyle. Either IEI or EIE. I think IEI because of the downward look, and EIE because she presents in a very outward way, with that snap and flash that e3 EIE's can have. But it is a toss-up between those two types.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

Clint Eastwood's personality does suck. But his face is fairly typical of SLI's, although most SLI faces today will be more full.

Just sayin', @Chae. I'm not saying you aren't IEE, but you are slightly different from the IEE's that I know. I can't put my finger on it, exactly, but a bit different.

---

Mhm. I like full faces (just like thick bodies if it matches up). I wrote a blog post about an SLI that I like, looks very attractive to me <3_<3 Gallery is below the post, let me know what you think :yup:

Of course I'm different, 4-wing! :biggrin: Now I'm curious - and (sel-)fishing for compliments: what exactly is it, indeed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

@Adam Strange On the other hand. While you are hooked, challenge: type these as well :3

---

Infantiles don't "hook" or challenge people, @Chae.

:)

IEE's go in, show their ass, and say "Well? Have I got your attention now? What are you going to do about it?"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

These are harder. I will say that there is no trace of SLI in the guy's face. Those eyes. He is too soft and victimy. Might be another IEI.

The woman is Beta victim. No one else could carry off that hairstyle. Either IEI or EIE. I think IEI because of the downward look, and EIE because she presents in a very outward way, with that snap and flash that e3 EIE's can have. But it is a toss-up between those two types.

---

Thanks! <3 Do we sense a pattern there :whistle: Could be my imago.

I'll show you other people I find attractive:

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...aac02a2508.jpg

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...2666ea8607.jpg

Kate Upton in this one ^^^

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

Infantiles don't "hook" or challenge people, @Chae.

:)

IEE's go in, show their ass, and say "Well? Have I got your attention now? What are you going to do about it?"

---

Your point being? ;) (If my retyping starts again Imma lose it)

The last part you described is :Se: though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

Thanks! <3 Do we sense a pattern there :whistle: Could be my imago.

I'll show you other people I find attractive:

Kate Upton in this one ^^^

---

These look like more Beta victims. I actually was wondering about your imago.

All those people Chae just posted seem like ESIs to me, ha. :p
P.S: Kate Upton is surely not IEI, and you can see how "easy" it can be to artistically make yourself "look like a Victim" (whatever that is supposed to mean).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

Your point being? ;) (If my retyping starts again Imma lose it)

The last part you described is :Se: though.

---

I'm not trying to re-type you. I think raindrops get to the sea eventually.

What I described is attraction behavior in three female IEE's whom I know. They (IEE's) need to be completely obvious and in-your-face to wake up their inert SLI duals. But once they have your attention, if you start after them, unlike Se-doms they will back up and defend. This is their way of separating their duals, who will not actually "go after them" at any speed, from everyone else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

These look like more Beta victims. I actually was wondering about your imago.

---

My imago is pretty far away from Beta NF personality-wise :lol: Maybe there is such a thing as a visual imago.

Quote:

---

+ protective, sacrificing, dominant, well-groomed, creative, honest, proactive, hard-working, image-conscious, nurturing, kind, funny, hygienic, responsible, lenient, non-violent, reliable, moral

- paint-by-numbers, conservative, ignorant, busy, aristocratic, critical, aloof, fearful, nit-picking, uninformed, tabooing, defensive, derogatory, compliant, egocentric, complaining, strict

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

Maybe there is such a thing as a visual imago.

---

Yes there is. Many people have a "physical type". ;)
Though I find that at the same time, the physical and the personality have to be a good mix for you to be very attracted to that person.
As in, if someone only looks like your Imago it won't be as powerful of an attraction as if they additionally had the kind of personality of your Imago.
And personally, I have noticed that when someone I am pretty attracted to doesn't exactly look like my Imago, they have certain Imago personality traits that "make up" for that, or vice versa.

P.S: This thread is a good place to gauge the qualities of people's "physical (Imago) types".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

I'm not trying to re-type you. I think raindrops get to the sea eventually.

What I described is attraction behavior in three female EII's whom I know. They (IEE's) need to be completely obvious and in-your-face to wake up their inert SLI duals. But once they have your attention, if you start after them, unlike Se-doms, they will back up and defend. This is their way of separating their duals, who will not actually "go after them" at any speed, from everyone else.

---

/dramatic choir chanting :Ni: :Ni: :Ni: appears at the philosophic statement/

Hm sure, why is challenging not on the list? I might as well be a 7w8 in disguise, fooling and playing around until I get what I waaant. Remember... Robert Downey Jr in a wig... he is me... I am him... huuu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

Yes there is. Many people have a "physical type". ;)
Though I find that at the same time, the physical and the personality have to be a good mix for you to be very attracted to that person.
As in, if someone only looks like your Imago it won't be as powerful of an attraction as if they additionally had the kind of personality of your Imago.
And personally, I have noticed that when someone I am pretty attracted to doesn't exactly look like my Imago, they have certain Imago personality traits that "make up" for that, and vice versa.

---

Ohhh yes that rings somewhat true. How does a visual imago form? Parent-based again?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

These are harder. I will say that there is no trace of SLI in the guy's face. Those eyes. He is too soft and victimy. Might be another IEI.

The woman is Beta victim. No one else could carry off that hairstyle. Either IEI or EIE. I think IEI because of the downward look, and EIE because she presents in a very outward way, with that snap and flash that e3 EIE's can have. But it is a toss-up between those two types.

---

The hairstyle is not type related. There are plenty of deltas here who have played with similar styles. IEE fits Chae very well actually. Her Ne and Fe is 4d but she feels more delta NF to me and obviously herself. Ne is even more obvious than Fe. Fi is on par with other IEE I know. Take another look at chae but this time, see her as a whole being. Pay attention to what she is saying to you. You don't always "listen" because you have a head full of your own ideas about people that don't always match up to reality. :/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

Ohhh yes that rings somewhat true. How does a visual imago form? Parent-based again?

---

Hm, it often is parent-based (esp. the parent who has the sex you are the most attracted to).
However, it can also be based on any other person who's had a significant impact on you. It could also be cultural to an extent.
Many factors go into it, it's not always easy to tell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

All those people Chae just posted seem like ESIs to me, ha. :p
P.S: Kate Upton is surely not IEI, and you can see how "easy" it can be to artistically make yourself "look like a Victim" (whatever that is supposed to mean).

---

EUREKA moment!

Both you and @Adam Strange are projecting. Do you notice what's going on?

And yes, the artsy victim style. But it's not Kate Upton that I like outside of this shoot, merely this portrayal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

EUREKA moment!

Both you and @Adam Strange are projecting. Do you notice what's going on?

And yes, the artsy victim style. But it's not Kate Upton that I like outside of this shoot, merely this portrayal.

---

Hm, I wouldn't call it projecting, but it is obvious we have formed certain "Ni ideas" on how certain types may present themselves.
And it is clear that for some reason, a lot of people I'd type as ESI would be typed as IEI by others (including him).
Different interpretations of the same kind of person, I suppose. A similar chasm exists between SLI and LSI. Some people type one individual as LSI, whereas the others would swear they are SLI. This is one of the issues with Socionics...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

My imago is pretty far away from Beta NF personality-wise :lol: Maybe there is such a thing as a visual imago.

---

Yes, your descriptions do sound a lot like male SLI characteristics. I wonder why your visual preferences are so different?

FWIW, my visual and personality preferences also differ from each other. For me, the typical ESI is not that attractive. (Well, TBH, the typical person is not that attractive to me. Even if they are beautiful, I might not be attracted to them.) The best looking ESI's (to me) are what I would call visually atypical. Their personalities are just right, though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

Hm, it often is parent-based (esp. the parent who has the sex you are the most attracted to).
However, it can also be based on any other person who's had a significant impact on you. It could also be cultural to an extent.
Many factors go into it, it's not always easy to tell.

---

Hm. Hmmm hmhmmh. Mhhm. Currently going through my mental inventory of significant loved people.

Yes. I have one, he's INFx So/Sx most likely, most socially connected and soft person I know, can be cheery, the doe eyes type.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

Yes, your descriptions do sound a lot like male SLI characteristics. I wonder why your visual preferences are so different?

FWIW, my visual and personality preferences also differ from each other. For me, the typical ESI is not that attractive. (Well, TBH, the typical person is not that attractive to me. Even if they are beautiful, I might not be attracted to them.) The best looking ESI's are what I would call visually atypical. Their personalities are just right, though.

---

All I know is: my personality imago is enneagram 1 as hell.

That would be the perfect example of what Cassandra described, discrepancy between visual and character imago preference.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

EUREKA moment!

Both you and @Adam Strange are projecting. Do you notice what's going on?

And yes, the artsy victim style. But it's not Kate Upton that I like outside of this shoot, merely this portrayal.

---

Hmmm. Isn't projecting where you assign your own properties to someone or something else? What would I be projecting?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

Hm, I wouldn't call it projecting, but it is obvious we have formed certain "Ni ideas" on how certain types may present themselves.
And it is clear that for some reason, a lot of people I'd type as ESI would be typed as IEI by others (including him).
Different interpretations of the same kind of person, I suppose. A similar chasm exists between SLI and LSI. Many people type one person as LSI, whereas the others would swear they are SLI. This is one of the issues with Socionics...

---

You both lack experience and understanding. That will come in time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

That would be the perfect example of what Cassandra described, discrepancy between visual and character imago preference.

---

I don't think there has to be a discrepancy between visual and character Imago preferences.

For instance, my visual Imago is predominately dark-haired and/or has dark eyes, etc.
Many different types can have that combination. :p

However, if you mean by "visual" how someone dresses themselves, and/or how they move and smile and talk, then I'd say this is actually closer to the character part, because those aspects are influenced by personality (types).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

Hm, I wouldn't call it projecting, but it is obvious we have formed certain "Ni ideas" on how certain types may present themselves.
And it is clear that for some reason, a lot of people I'd type as ESI would be typed as IEI by others (including him).
Different interpretations of the same kind of person, I suppose. A similar chasm exists between SLI and LSI. Some people type one individual as LSI, whereas the others would swear they are SLI. This is one of the issues with Socionics...

---

The issue ain't theory, it's about the subjective and predisposed views of people :hello: Adam is SLE-ing again, and you - the person who types ESI after ESI, I've seen your blog - are in the same mechanism :shock: Personally I cannot categorize all of my pictures as Beta NF, they all differ so much.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

I don't think there has to be a discrepancy between visual and character Imago preferences.

For instance, my visual Imago is predominately dark-haired and/or has dark eyes, etc.
Many different types can have that combination. :p

However, if you mean by "visual" how someone dresses themselves, and/or how they move and smile and talk, then I'd say this is actually closer to the character part, because those aspects are influenced by personality (types).

---

Nah, the truth is somewhere in between here :biggrin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aylen

You both lack experience and understanding. That will come in time.

---

That's a very sweeping statement...
Especially considering Adam's (dating) history and such, how is he inexperienced?? Haha.
Oh well. xD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

Hmmm. Isn't projecting where you assign your own properties to someone or something else? What would I be projecting?

---

SLE 8. Just as in your presentation of how IEEs approach SLIs above, same principle happened.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

The issue ain't theory, it's about the subjective and predisposed views of people :hello: Adam is SLE-ing again, and you - the person who types ESI after ESI, I've seen your blog - are in the same mechanism :shock: Personally I cannot categorize all of my pictures as Beta NF, they all differ so much.

---

My blog, you mean my deleted blog entry on the types of some of the people on this forum?
Well, I've also got a typing blog where most people on there aren't ESI, so... It is not like I type most people I come across as ESI by default. :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

That's a very sweeping statement...
Especially considering Adam's (dating) history and such, how is he inexperienced?? Haha.
Oh well. xD

---

Big picture.

He might have dated lots of types but doesn't seem he has any depth of understanding. Perhaps you have had deeper conversations with him. I go by the posts I have read.

Is your thumbnail green?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aylen

You both lack experience and understanding. That will come in time.

---

/furious choir chants of :Ni: :Ni: :Ni: intensify/

Now, what would be your assessment of my pictures?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

My blog, you mean my deleted blog entry on the types of some of the people on this forum?
Well, I've also got a typing blog where most people on there aren't ESI, so... It is not like I type most people I come across as ESI by default. :p

---

/imitates Aylen/ You will see what I mean... in time :hello:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aylen

The hairstyle is not type related. There are plenty of deltas here who have played with similar styles. IEE fits Chae very well actually. Her Ne and Fe is 4d but she feels more delta NF to me and obviously herself. Ne is even more obvious than Fe. Fi is on par with other IEE I know. Take another look at chae but this time, see her as a whole being. Pay attention to what she is saying to you. You don't always "listen" because you have a head full of your own ideas about people that don't always match up to reality. :/

---

Almost overlooked this post! Ahh cute. ~<3 Strangey can step up his game but I let a drag queen gif tell him that from time to time no worries.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

/furious choir chants of :Ni: :Ni: :Ni: intensify/

Now, what would be your assessment of my pictures?

---

My assessment is your angelic looking creatures are amazing to look at. I would have to really focus on their energy and maybe read something about them to even offer a typing. I would rather do that in private. <3

^ The safe answer.

I have one more I wanted to post! Mom gave me a postcard with this image when I was 10,11? Don't know. Either way, I find this sooo appealing.

Dicap 1997 by Annie Leibowitz:

https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-st...58201536-7.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aylen

My assessment is your angelic looking creatures are amazing to look at. I would have to really focus on their energy and maybe read something about them to even offer a typing. I would rather do that in private. <3

---

Angelic is good! Handjob is among that collection since day one hehe. Sweet offer! I was merely asking for a vibe feeling but if you like the complexity of it, why not it's enlightenting for sure :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

Hm, it often is parent-based (esp. the parent who has the sex you are the most attracted to).
However, it can also be based on any other person who's had a significant impact on you. It could also be cultural to an extent.
Many factors go into it, it's not always easy to tell.

---

Like the boy who saved my life when I was drowning type? I only saw him for less than a minute. I have been attracted to that type even before I hit puberty. That is not all I find attractive though. Many factors do go into it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

^ The safe answer.

---

What would be the unsafe one... wohaha

https://s3.amazonaws.com/neowin/foru...7c56ce272c.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

SLE 8. Just as in your presentation of how IEEs approach SLIs above, same principle happened.

---

I think I can appear like an SLE e8 for a short time and from a distance, but I consistently test as an LIE with lots of Se, which I attribute to being sx-first and to the test's inabilities to perfectly separate the two. Also, I know a lot of IEI females, but I've never had sex with one, despite having one who wants a LTR. I'm actually attracted to Aggressors.

And Aylen might be right about my depth of understanding. I've been flying by the seat of my pants, out of Delta and into Aggressorland, and that probably accounts for a lot of my wanderings. However, I will say, I do know what feels right, and it is both Gamma and Aggressor.

Attachment 9524

Attachment 9525

Attachment 9526

Attachment 9527

Attachment 9528

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

I think I can appear like an SLE e8 for a short time and from a distance, but I consistently test as an LIE with lots of Se, which I attribute to being sx-first and to the test's inabilities to perfectly separate the two. Also, I know a lot of IEI females, but I've never had sex with one, despite having one who wants a LTR. I'm actually attracted to Aggressors.

And Aylen might be right about my depth of understanding. I've been flying by the seat of my pants, out of Delta and into Aggressorland, and that probably accounts for a lot of my wanderings. However, I will say, I do know what feels right, and it is both Gamma and Aggressor.

Attachment 9524

Attachment 9525

Attachment 9526

Attachment 9527

---

I know from experience how tests only mirror how you want to see yourself, not how you actually are. But as you said, rain drops, your type will find you ~.~

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

^ The safe answer.

---

LOL I don't even know these people. How do you expect me to know their personality after viewing them a few seconds? If you observed more and let things synthesize in your brain your typings would be more accurate. You go for for superficial details.

You seem to see yourself as the one true oracle on this forum. That is not true intuition. It is arrogance. Go on and type me ESI or some other random far off type. I have told you before I was you once. Life is going to knock you down a peg or two over time. It will prove you wrong repeatedly until you get the message. Then maybe you will find the true intuitive voice inside you. Remember I said this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

I know from experience how tests only mirror how you want to see yourself, not how you actually are. But as you said, rain drops, your type will find you ~.~

---

I work with two SLE's, an SLE-Ti and an SLE-Se, and they both treat me like a Benefactor rather than an Identical. One of the Conflictor SEI's at work hates everything about me, the other gets distressed from cognitive dissonance when I talk to her for more than a few minutes, despite the fact that I like her a lot. Plus, none of the IEI's here seem to be going out of their way to be nice to me. (Lol. Not that that's a bad thing.) My SLI father and son Supervisors both think I'm a screw-up. Also, I took those tests before I knew anything about LIE's or SLE's or enneagrams or stacks.

Oh, well. At least, no one has called me LSE in a while. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aylen

LOL I don't even know these people. How do you expect me to know their personality after viewing them a few seconds? If you observed more and let things synthesize in your brain your typings would be more accurate. You go for for superficial details.

You seem to see yourself as the one true oracle on this forum. That is not true intuition. It is arrogance. Go on and type me ESI or some other random far off type. I have told you before I was you once. Life is going to knock you down a peg or two over time. It will prove you wrong repeatedly until you get the message. Then maybe you will find the true intuitive voice inside you. Remember I said this.

---

She's starting to remind me of a certain arrogant EII/LII combo t16t member you had a beef with.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

I work with two SLE's, an SLE-Ti and an SLE-Se, and they both treat me like a Benefactor rather than an Identical. One of the Conflictor SEI's at work hates everything about me, the other gets distressed from cognitive dissonance when I talk to her for more than a few minutes, despite the fact that I like her a lot. Plus, none of the IEI's here seem to be going out of their way to be nice to me. (Lol. Not that that's a bad thing.) My SLI father and son Supervisors both think I'm a screw-up. Also, I took those tests before I knew anything about LIE's or SLE's or enneagrams or stacks.

Oh, well. At least, no one has called me LSE in a while. :)

---

That one is second on my list. Your anecdote about Cary Grant's suit, I remember it :D (Plot twist: Him and Clint Eastwood are your Imago types :love2:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

That one is second on my list. Your anecdote about Cary Grant's suit, I remember it :D (Plot twist: Him and Clint Eastwood are your Imago types :love2:)

---

No LIE anywhere to be seen, eh? Bummer.

What do LIE's seem like to you, @Chae? In terms of looks, behaviors, preferences?

Eh, ideal attractiveness has a lot to do with culture and the country that you grew up in...

For example, this is Germany's "ideal face" of a female:

https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-st...-3.jpg?no-auto

Original:

https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-st...03717643-6.jpg

https://www.buzzfeed.com/ashleyperez...vvM#.roEOrBggJ

This seems to go in line with Chae's preference for more soft and ethereal look.

@Singularity good viewpoint!! Since Germany is very culturally Beta ST this could be the explanation why I select Beta NF members. Soft faces are somewhat valued here, less in males.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adam Strange

No LIE anywhere to be seen, eh? Bummer.

What do LIE's seem like to you, @Chae?

---

Go to the Elon Musk thread, I posted there :purr:

Warm built bodies. Broad shoulders. Expressionless cold-ish faces.
That's why most LSIs turn me on :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

What would be the unsafe one... wohaha

https://s3.amazonaws.com/neowin/foru...7c56ce272c.gif

---

This made me laugh, haha! :lol:
Let's just put this to rest... :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

I have one more I wanted to post! Mom gave me a postcard with this image when I was 10,11? Don't know. Either way, I find this sooo appealing.

Dicap 1997 by Annie Leibowitz:

https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-st...58201536-7.jpg

---

http://i.imgur.com/kNsdXln.jpg

:lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cassandra

This made me laugh, haha! :lol:
Let's just put this to rest... :p

---

You're so cute lmao :love2: Yeah let's focus on more swan memes please :biggrin:

Attachment 9530

Attachment 9532

It's impossible for me to be seriously attracted to someone without knowing their personality/vibe.

Attachment 9536

I don't find them to be attractive-attractive, but I just find their faces to be interesting:

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....a%2Bg9iqNL.jpg

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/3093430/th...EFFA-570.jpg?1

http://images4.fanpop.com/image/phot...17-500-402.jpg

This is pretty much an ideal face for me:

http://ancientrome.ru/art/artwork/sc...tus/aug116.jpg

I'm sure that there are more if I bothered to look, but I'm too lazy.

For women, it's super cool if they're either emotionless, expressionless or sometimes have a mischievous smile.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Singularity

I don't find them to be attractive-attractive, but I just find their faces to be interesting:

For women, it's super cool if they're either emotionless, expressionless or sometimes have a mischievous smile.

---

So what is attractive-attractive to you? ;)
Besides, are you bisexual? Just asking, because you posted both men and women, and not everyone does that in one post.

jessica lange when she was young, oh gosh

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...e7ab4333b0.jpg
she's still hot now that she's old too tho, gah. i want her to STEP ON ME and carve me hollow with her cheekbones idhgdl

Attachment 9539 Attachment 9540
and here's Jean Shrimpton!! i guess i just really love carved out looking faces if that makes sense? ugh, i'm bad at descriptions

when it comes to guys, i'm really picky... i can't really think of what i find physically attracting in men. maybe broad shoulders and strong cheekbones?

Hmm... I think a dude with a giant antennae-like cowlick sticking up from the middle of his hair. Because after my hair cut it put the cowlick that has always been there in to full motion. With other hair cuts I could hide it. We could build a doomsday device in space, both wear evil capes, and control the doomsday device via our PSI cowlicks. Psychokino in unison.

Heterochromia and squat booty.

I am partial to name brands. :hello:

http://i.imgur.com/zRUWfbe.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Starfall

I'm starting to think I like cartoon guys better than real guys.

http://youtu.be/Gh1Vn3JSuSs

---

Me too :oops: I love the main character from 91 Days.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chae

@Singularity good viewpoint!! Since Germany is very culturally Beta ST this could be the explanation why I select Beta NF members. Soft faces are somewhat valued here, less in males.

---

I also live in Germany, but Germany is very Delta-value (ESTj, ISTp) and also somehow Alpha-value (ESFj, ISFp) heavy in my opinion! Intensity and crassness is not appreciated here. Normality, stability and so on are very common. I noticed how most people are Delta and Alpha here, at least how I experienced it. Like most people have this very practical Jack Wolfskin and crocs sense of fashion (lol), are very laid back and like to live this safe, stable and harmonious life style. Many people are very prude and prefer traditional beauties. But yes soft features in females are valued here, though I noticed this is the case in most cultures, not necessarily only here (?).

Guys I find attractive:
Attachment 9656
Attachment 9657
Attachment 9659

Ethnicity doesn't really matter to me, if someone is attractive then they are no matter their skin/hair/eye colour. To me it's mostly about sharp and manly looks (I kinda like the bad boy vibe with tattoos) and a not too skinny built with broad shoulders and a good back.

Women I find attractice (yes I added girls too, because why not haha):

Attachment 9660
Attachment 9661
Attachment 9662
Attachment 9663

Apparently when I removed a picture I didn't like it appeared as an attached thumbnail at the bottom of the post.. anyone knows how to properly remove it? It's kinda annoying. :<

@MaviTilki I think Germany is Delta (prob ESTj)... why do people think that it's Beta?

.

Attachment 9675

Attachment 9676

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaviTilki

@Singularity Might be because of all these stereotypes about ****** (I believe he really might have been INFp after all) and Nazi Germany (trust me so many people still think it's the same as more than 70 years ago.. like the ignorance is strong with people xD).
Yes many people here are 'caregivers' actually. Heavy focus on Si and stability here. Even though Germany is very Delta-value heavy (lawful citizens and lots of bureaucracy), the stereotype of the 'basic/typical' girl is the ESFj girl (not trying to bash, but I noticed many girls here are this type, and most girly activities are associated with what ESFjs kind of embody). I feel that the MBTI contribution of types is much more accurate than the socionics ones I saw. Deltas and Alphas kind of make up most of society, followed by the Gamma and Beta aggressors and I really believe the victim types are the rarest. Even the infantiles I met are very low-key 'crazy', like everything is still very grounded when it comes to craziness. They still love and seek stability (I do not find most Ne types that weird or peculiar at all, I thik they actually value normality as much as the caregivers, but they are very open-minded to ideas and weird phenomenas, I do not want to generalise too much though). I believe that most societies are into stability after all, it's very much necessary to keep everything together as a community.

---

I've made the same observations. :thumbsup:

Ironically, I am also from Germany and my parents are ESTj and ESFj (both Si subtype). :p
They are pretty much embodying the stereotypes.

Most people seem to be Caretakers and Childlike here, apart from (male) LSIs who are fairly common too, followed by ESIs.
Both SEEs and SLEs aren't common, and Victims are rare.

Victims !

http://i.imgur.com/Fdmck2F.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/WmMaump.gif

http://i.imgur.com/ksD4Bh7.gif

.

Everyone mother is ESFJ !

https://images7.alphacoders.com/600/...920-600892.jpg

Oh you picture remind me something.... I should have added Dr Cameron from Dr House in my tastes, was big fan of her lol.

Attachment 9684

http://i.imgur.com/J5w3LJy.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/Y8R7MLC.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/cdlrFmb.jpg

I probably have a bit of a leather fetish... :shifty: :oops:

Am I alone to not be into "perfect" girl like model and stuff (my previous image wasn't representative lol just outa fun) ? I see everyone posting top model, Ive never been really attracted to model and stuff.... I'm looking currently "what to post" in this post searching for "female model" in google, I would probably have an easier time finding something to post if I searched in a random dating website...


@Cassandra stop posting or you will turn me homosexual lol
generally I can't say if a man is hot or not, but Ive to admit your models are stylish

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by noaydi

@Cassandra stop posting or you will turn me homosexual lol
generally I can't say if a man is hot or not, but Ive to admit your models are stylish

---

Haha!! :lol:
Thank you. xD
Guys can be stylish and hot, too. :D

P.S: Yesterday I have come across this and this, and for hours I've just been browsing the archives looking for pics of guys I find attractive... xD
P.P.S: I'm pretty sure the vast majority of those model guys are gay, so... I don't necessarily expect a straight guy to exactly look like one of them.

Don't just look at pics of attractive guys... go and meet attractive guys.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Singularity

Don't just look at pics of attractive guys... go and meet attractive guys.

---

I actually left the house this week and saw a few (more or less) attractive guys. :p

P.S: Don't ruin my fun here. :P Haha.