You can view the page at http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...STj-by-Beskova
Printable View
You can view the page at http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...STj-by-Beskova
May I marry a Shtirlits? LOL
Yes. His name is Burdsurd Absurd, the Polack.
That guy looks nothing like Jadae.
KILL SOCIONICS NOW
I miss Michael. :(
I don't know why I'm saying this; he knows it.
Someone has to maintain the illusion, especially this one.
k0rpsey left his asshole filter at home again :P
sounds pretty repulsive to me.
Oh and like Korpsy said of the word "distasteful," "repulsive" is also a non-ETHICAL word/reference; instead, both of those words point to aesthetics, which he also said is in combination of F + S.
:)
How in any way, shape or form do you explain your non ethical statements?
Oh oh OH...if you need to borrow any ethical words PAY ME BABY! LOL
ADVERTISEMENT:
Maritsa selling ethical words to non Fi base types which she types SEI; get it while supplies last; everything 50% off. :lol:
:thinking:
:cool:
http://www.planet-wissen.de/kultur_m...tion_neu_g.jpg
Explain Thyself!
Socionics is an input/output based cognitive system. Such that F is ethics, Fi is internalised and Fe is externalised. Fi is based around how the individual feels and meeting the emotional needs of others only when it affects the emotional state of the individual involved whereas Fe can be viewed as the emotions as having an understanding of the group emotional state and an understanding of how the expressed emotions can be altered.
No bow ties or petticoats are involved in either of these elements unless it results in wearing bow ties or petticoats which could also be chosen for numerous other reasons and a logical reason as to why you might wear them can be construed based upon any information element. For example: an individual might find wearing a tie to the office offers them internal comfort - this would reflect Si.
Unless you can understand the why, you can't judge the how in socionics.
Maritsa is continuously falling victim to k0rpsyesque shibboleths of the most simple order. No understanding of why, then a hasty generalization based on those shibboleths.
One is not repulsed by the persons hair cut in the ethical world; in the ethical world one is fine with whatever choice of hair cuts a person makes because in the FiNe world a person is seen for more than just their physical form; they are seen by the value of their character, friendship, relationship. They are loved for who they are.
PAY ME BABY! HAH
that's what you get for having a pretentious taste in male's haircuts
I have to side with Maritsa on this one, I don't see EIIs basing their likes or dislikes on appearances
pa3s has officially killed me.