What's the type of this soccer player?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5Vqg-cWEIs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeZb-tYDDbM
I'm especially interested in the opinion of Subterranean, aestrievix, Marie84, Bardia, Azeroffs.
Printable View
What's the type of this soccer player?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5Vqg-cWEIs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeZb-tYDDbM
I'm especially interested in the opinion of Subterranean, aestrievix, Marie84, Bardia, Azeroffs.
Yes.Quote:
testing us?
No. Or rather: at the very least, your opinion is inconsistent.
:(
edit for yours:If you're comparing it to our typings of you, it's not a fair comparison. I've typed all the people on my list through text alone as far as I'm aware, and they would be different than the typings I give through videos. That's not say that they wouldn't be inconsistent anyway.
Ok, gotcha.
Don't take my typings too seriously. I def don't. :p
wow, i'm really interested in what people think this guy's type is too. I used to know a guy who has very similar facial mannerisms. I tentatively typed that guy i knew as ILI but was never sure about that typing.
He VI's as an ESI-Se guy that I know.
And the shown behaviour and attitude doesn't seem to contradict that very much, so at this point I would go for: ESI (Se sub)
Slightly confident.
Seems Te/Fi. Other than that I don't know. I also don't care enough to seriously attempt typing people I don't know or care about. If you are unhappy with my typing of you maybe you should make a video.
I think I know what's the right answer. However, ladies first.Go ahead.Quote:
Subterranean, aestrievix, Marie84, Bardia, Azeroffs.
Not enough info, but LIE seems possible.
haha, I don't guess, you already said the answer in irc
WOW HE LOOKS LIKE FABIO
I WONDER WHAT WE'RE SUPPOSED TO SAY
I was going to say LSE too, actually. *whistle*
IMO he seems much too present and grounded, his eyes too soft and open for an Ni ego; compare to people like Ashton and Expat whose presence tends to have the feel of a twitchy rabbit. This guy reminds me of the LSE Mexican stock manager at my job.
Maybe you could just wimper instead next time
I'm thinking ENTj
as a side note Manchester United is reportedly thinking of buying him for £25 if they can't get Wesley Sneijder (ESTj) with reported value £35
this should give all you everything-is-typerelated folks something to think about :p
I'm sure your magical mystical powers of self-delusion work great for convincing yourself of a pre-determined typing.
Listen. I know what eye movements mean, I can read people pretty well, but EVERYONE does this kind of thing. Trying to elucidate mental images does not make someone intuitive rather than sensory, or Ni>Si; EVERYONE does this when describing their experiences or doing any kind of thinking when they are responding.
We can agree that Mel Gibson is LSE, no?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YHccyFZKPU
John Candy, SEI:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr0HEoRdtiw
My question to you is, what is the difference you perceive in the way this soccer player moves his eyes when compared to these others?
I thought ENTjs are supposed to come across as slightly softer than ESTjs, given the not-well-defined vs well-defined plus intuition vs sensing that characterizes them. I don't think ENTjs are supposed to come across as particularly non-grounded either, after all they're a dominant extraverted thinking type, not introverted intuition.
Anyway, check out this video of him as a small kid - I think in this interview he shows a lot of Ni create, example at minute :20 where he explains his unwillingness to be called "next zidane", or 1:30 where he project himself in the future from a lot of angles
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRAAPHnRvjI&feature=related
Not everyone here has seen me on cam.Quote:
WOW HE LOOKS LIKE FABIO
I WONDER WHAT WE'RE SUPPOSED TO SAY
I think LIE.
SEI
This guy is really inconsistent with my general picture of Si-PoLR EJs. He doesn't seem tense or frenetic at all; I can see why people would think he is extroverted and rational, but Se-seeking and Si-polr on top of that is a stretch IMO. He seems low key, no real internal tension or physical strain; he seems very comfortable in his skin, relaxed, even fluid; not really internally mobilized like Decisive types.
So?
You're being a bit stereotypical too by implying that Si PoLRs can't be comfortable and relaxed in their own skin ;) they'll still forget about obvious details, chores, and overwork themselves from time to time. Also consider that he trains every day, so he's got plenty of opportunity to release all his internal tension...
One example of Se seeking attitude, second video: "We should really have no fear about winning when we're leading at home". Another example of resolute: "If I don't become a professional soccer player I'd still need a professional qualification (doctor)". etc. etc.
He just seems very grounded to me; one could make the argument that he is an athlete and therefore more in tune with his body, but I could draw a whole host of exceptions to counter. Every Si PoLR I've ever met just seems much more internally active; even when it's not applicable to the moment or about to happen, you can still sense it from them. His gaze is very soft and settled, his eyes tend to drag rather than dart about like Se-valuing extroverts; even strrrng, IEI, has more noticeably rapid and active eye movements, more internal tension, more noticeable physical mobilization than this guy.
It's not just about being comfortable in his skin; it's about his whole demeanor. He's very relaxed, hardly composed or tense or rigid at all. Even in the post-game video he seems grounded, attempting to keep his energy down, like mobilization is not his natural state; contrast to Se valuing types I am even wondering if he's not SLI; Fe PoLR doesn't jump out at me at all, but it makes more sense than Si PoLR IMO.
I've met some quite relaxed Ni-EJs. Perhaps there's some cultural pattern at play, too, given that the grew up in mediterranean france (which is quite similar to coastal central-northern italy). Or maybe we are both SLIs, but that seems not terribly likely, although possible.