:Te: :Te: :Te: :Te:
Printable View
:Te: :Te: :Te: :Te:
More information, please.
Based on that, I'd have said ESTj perhaps. But it's probably wrong.
:Te: :Te: :Te: :Te:
:Fe:
:Te: :Te: :Te: :Te:
Although i thought ESTj at first glance, i don't see as much :Ne: in her eyes as in ESTj's in general.Quote:
Originally Posted by implied
*confused*
asldkfjlkj rocky i was hoping you'd know this one. ):
I was talking about detail's comment.
But I couldn't tell enough from that picture. ISTP maybe? More info?
What was confusing? Bad english?
i'll see if i can dig some more info/anecdotes about her from my dad later. maybe i can find some more pix, too.
i could see ISTp working pretty well in that sort of golden girls sophia petrillo hilarious old lady way.
I think you'd have to consider if, 1) these people you are talking about are really ESTJ or, 2) if the look you are talking about is really associated with Ne.Quote:
Originally Posted by detail
1) They are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocky
2) It's in both ESTjs and ESFjs and i see it as being directly related to their hidden agenda. Often their eyes seem like perfect little circles with a look that i can link to "funny", as if they were on the look out. I interpret it as :Ne: but i couldn't argue about it with full certitude yet, as of course evidence is lacking and i didn't oppose other possibilities in such a way that proves what my impressions are slowly building regarding that look. Though it really looks like :Ne: transformed into a not so well controlled tool as opposed to :Ne: as a base function. I intuite that if you take an EN*p look and put a frame around it, it will give the ES*j look i'm reffering to. It also seems like a less confident version of how IN*js use :Ne:. What do you think about it?
I don't think hidden agenda affects the look people's eyes give... I haven't seen it in other types...
So you think the similarity i described is due to :Si: (As i consider you don't think i hallucinate)?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocky