Printable View
If you believe she to be SEI and in the validity of Socionics you have the capability to demonstrate her type without explaining. Show evidence of SEI behavior or cognition, and people will agree or not that the evidence is affirmative, and there you have your accuracy of opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by polikujm
Watch this video from 10:30 till 12:20, especially towards the end:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdMbUVzzc-0&t=10m25s
This kind of self-expression and emotionality is typical for IEEs and SEEs.
Everyone is on crack.
I refuse to like Bionicgoat's posts because I have a nasty competitive streak that not many people know about. They think just cuz I'm so soft, gentle & faggy I don't know how to compete. I want to be just as popular as BG so I refuse to hit the LIKE posts for his awesome trolling and sense of humor, because I am in competition to get more likes than that.
Hehehe.
/me cat fights with BG. (and allie)
It's not really her fault for being fake though. I suppose she could leave the spotlight if she really wanted to, but all that money and power when you're so used to it seems hard to pass up. =/Quote:
Going by some of her interviews, she sounds SiFe on a surface level, but again, there's that tricky thing with her being fake.
If she was 'herself' she wouldn't sell as many records. But if she's narcissistically beautiful, everybody loves her and she sells billions. "LA told me, you'll be a pop star. all you have to do is change everything you are."
And even if her music is like preppy and fake and narc, or whatever, I still like it. =p
a few weeks ago my SEE friend went kind of crazy over some situation with a guy. it was as if she couldn't stop herself from doing things she shouldn't. she would call me up, slightly hysterical, and i would have to tell her over and over again NOT to go over to the guy's place, not to try and talk to him, etc.. my SEE would even say things like "just tell me i'm crazy glam, just tell me i'm crazy.." it was as if she knew what she was doing/what she wanted to was completely irrational, but she still had the hardest time stopping herself from taking action.Quote:
Originally Posted by Starfall
maybe Spears experienced similar feelings in her situation, but didn't have anyone to try and stop her.
the kind that comes from the bared fruit of the great tree of socionics.Quote:
Originally Posted by polikujm
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Divided
SEI
She's SEI.. look at her. She uses Si. What Jung described as the idea of a proper chair, the idea of a proper dress code, etc. She is judgmental in that gossiping secretary way. SEE is alot more mindless. She does put on a front of being mindless, but she really isn't. That's more the media presentation of her than the reality.
SEE. sx/so
I completely agree with you. Her image/persona is SEE but the person behind it is probably an SEI.Quote:
Originally Posted by crazedratfugue
I doubt it, If she's introvert she's ESI.Quote:
Originally Posted by Name13
http://www.harpersbazaar.com/magazin...sip-and-family
Taking from a casual interview, pretty much Brittney is not concerned with proper dress code or anything like that.
You can find tons of interviews just like this one, and it doesn't really show :Si:.Quote:
Originally Posted by Interview
Take something like this, there is the opportunity to really express herself but of course there's no :Si:.Quote:
Originally Posted by Name13
Someone that is far more obviously verbalizing and expressing herself with :Si: is Vanessa Hudgens.
http://www.justjaredjr.com/2013/03/1...ere-interview/
http://collider.com/vanessa-hudgens-interview-beastly/
There is a big difference between :Se: and :Si: as far as sensory information. :Se: is volitional and active, "Doing stuff", :Si: is passive and experiential, "Experiencing stuff".
SEE seem an ok typing for her
I honestly don't think I've ever came across someone as phoney and annoying and irritating as britney spears. Her emotions and reactions seem incredibly fake to me. I can't even watch her for more than 2 minutes without wanting to pull my hair out. She reminds me of my sister in that aspect. Everything is phoney and her reactions are only the reactions she thinks people want to see. Disgusting. SEI.
She seems rather infantile to me. Not someone I would want to spend ANY time around.
SEI
She's an introvert. When she was younger, she spent most of her time dancing in her room by herself instead of socializing much.
You're getting good at this :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Name13
Imo, she's probably SEI.
Thanks :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritsa
I miss you; where have you been?Quote:
Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold
Hmm is she SEE, or is she something completely the opposite like SEI, hmmm lets argue this for a couple of weeks. But by all means lets all voice our opinion and then argue forever about how you're right when not a single people knows what they are talking about. At the end of it not a single person will agree with anybody because let's be honest, we were not going to agree in the first place, right.
good to see you posting, erk. <3Quote:
Originally Posted by Erk
Yeah I'm just pissed off from work and now I'm in the mood to tell everyone off.
Did you really miss me tho?
I love you too. *kiss*
My impression is Alpha SF with a Gamma SF/SEE image.
SEE
Well, if she is alpha then clearly wrong subtype (for my preference) + messed up by media industry. Good SEI will always talk about comfort and stuff. Ti valuing? I think words like sanctuary refers to :Ni: seeking. :Se: base has willpower of resistance :Se:-. Complies life events into whole. I think :Ne: role.
Looks very much like SEE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITBk58yOpCM
Seriously? Makes life long decisions. Did that ever cross your mind? No... :Ni: 1D.
I cannot see her as anything but Gamma SF.
She just seems so childish in like the alpha way when you see more of her but idk she could be gamma SF too. She's an SF 100%. Her eyes look unfocused in a Pi way and she doesn't purposely use Se, except when she was having her breakdown which is the only thing that looked SEE/gamma SF to me besides her songs. But she doesn't craft her songs or image, which is what is gamma SF.
Not gamma
She's a fairly stereotypical SEE... Beta NFs usually love her.
These are like the only lyrics that she has ever written... which I think are also fairly stereotypically SEE:
She didn't write this song, but it's basically Se:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb1ad7r5oN8
Why don't you do something!
She probably personally liked the song:
The song was never planned to be released as a single. However, Spears wanted to shoot a music video for the song and had to fight with her record label to do it. She explained she was "a little disappointed" that she had to convince them "that making this video was the right thing to do at the time".
Hard for me say really other then her obviously being SF. Sometimes she comes off as soft and innocent like an SEI, sometimes forceful and rebellious like an SEE, and sometimes just plain chatty and emotional like an ESE.
I think only an SEE could call out and attack a womanizer like THIS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMqayQ-U74s
Yeah it's her video persona, acting. So that's rather a typing for her artistic performance. But confer other videos like "Circus", "Criminal", "Piece Of Me", "Work B**ch", "Toxic". There seems to be a :Se:-ish pattern.
Se base imo. And this whole - "seems Alfa/acts SEE" thing makes me think she could be SLE (merry quadra, Se base, playing up SEEish image to the public).
SLE or SEE anyway.
Probably SEI
could be IEE tbh
https://ew.com/music/2018/10/23/baby...-oral-history/
An interesting article about "...Baby One More Time".
Apparently she sort of commandeered the music video direction despite being young and new to the industry. That has to speak for high Se.