fdsgf
Printable View
fdsgf
Fi PoLR, amirite?
Mentally deranged in a way not necessarily type-related, but to the extent psychosis/violence are typable they'd probably be SLE-Se > everything else.
anti social personality disorder : SLI / SLE
I have encountered/had close contact with 3 people whom I believe to be sociopaths, and all 3 are EIE-Ni, luls.
I thought you considered yourself as 5 different people :p
ntr.
each type has it's own proclivities towards violence.
psychopaths - advanced form of antisocial/sociopathy, the terminology isn't so important, its how the illness progresses from normal to antisocial to sociopathy to psychopathy. While people have these precise scholarly terms for each stage in reality the model is much more fluid.
rapists - different motives depending on the rapist, usually the idea of dominating the victim feeds the libido more than the actual sex.
molesters - similar to rapists
criminals - they break the law (imo not necessarily in the same category as psychopaths, rapists, and molesters... these people usually lack empathy for their victims, if the law is made by sociopaths <hypothetically> then being a criminal necessarily doesn't imply a lack of empathy)
Trying to explain complex psychological problems like these using socionics is a big mistake. Honestly, the less mentally healthy people get, the more socionics starts to break down and become irrelevant.
HLD, I wouldn't say criminals necessarily lack empathy for their victims. People have a lot of conflicting internal drives, and even when one of them overwhelms empathy, I don't think empathy disappears altogether. Almost everyone is selfish and empathetic; things aren't so black and white. Plus, there are victimless crimes.
re-read what I wrote, I think you misunderstood.
I am saying
psychopaths, rapists, and molesters -- lack of empathy in varying levels
criminals -- not necessarily a lack of empathy
you are leading in saying "I wouldn't say criminals necessarily lack empathy..."
lol THATS WHAT I SAID! go re-read it
being very direct all that criminal means more or less is a one who commits a criminal offense, criminal being opposed to civil. Civil being citizen against citizen or a government body versus a government body (state vs state).... criminal being a citizen versus a government body (person vs state). Saying all criminals lack empathy, has the implicit assumption that anything against the government's agenda requires a lack of empathy. This of course is ridiculous, like you said there are victimless crimes, further it assumes the state always has policy formed to reinforce empathy, this is clearly not the case, just consider the nazis, a very clear example where empathy and government policy do not coincide.
Se PoLR making the quiet patient one explode on someone, amirite?
Ethical type = crimes of passion, amirite?