This one is shorter and vaguer http://dissonance.my3gb.com/mbti.html
Printable View
This one is shorter and vaguer http://dissonance.my3gb.com/mbti.html
INFJ INTJ ESFP ESTP
I end up putting Ni > Ti = Te, so I've gotten INTJ each time I've taken it. It could be I'm just misunderstanding what it's referring to as inner truth = Ti, because I do relate a lot to Te too.
Also, because this test is vague, it helps to understand what the difference between N-S and T-F is by reading the descriptions of each function just below it. I had a tie between F-T at first, but went back to change it to T because it gave me more information about what the F functions did compared to the T functions, idk sometimes its just the wording. I try not to judge the test questions harshly and just go with the limited information it provides so I'm not biased.
Test is shite. It was designed by a Type Central member with some weird ideas about the functions.
I can buy that he has weird ideas about MBTI functions, because this test seemed surprisingly non-MBTI, even Socionics-like (regardless of its limited usefulness) - especially Se/Si. I wouldn't say those definitions are bad, although too vague to be really useful as a test. I like the idea of environmental relevance - I used something akin to that in explaining bodies/fields before.
I ended up with INTJ and ENTP. Surprisingly enough, Ni/Ne one was hardest to interpret, I could twist it either way, though Ni seems closer if I get the right spirit behind those descriptions. I picked Te over Ti.
Heh, this "test" reminds me of the two I took before, I mean one in particular. Anyway, got ESTJ and ENTJ on it.
INTP
F 28%
Fi 11.2%
Fe 16.8%
T 42%
Ti 29.4%
Te 12.6%
N 24%
Ni 8.4%
Ne 15.6%
S 6%
Si 3.6%
Se 2.4%
Test is too transparent to be of much good.
ENTJ