Originally Posted by
Aiss
OK. So, I'm going to say it after all... since you've mentioned NT as an option, I suppose it's a clue to go on. Several times now - the first a few months ago - I thought you are the other Ni dominant. There were several reasons - the way you write as opposed to other IEIs, the way you don't seem to have Te-PoLR (and react to Te with Ti-HA), which is something I usually stumble over in discussion with IEIs, somehow focus on logic, but not absolute, which I'd associate with Ti (I imagine this might be the "core" B&D speaks about; I sure see it in some IEIs as absolutism), and what you've said about your relation with LSE claiming conflict can be overcome sounded more like supervision to me. In this last case, I considered suggesting the person was mistyped but decided against it since you seemed pretty close to and sure about the types of people involved, but later it made sense it might be you. Each time, I wasn't going to say anything since I can hardly imagine how you could have mistyped as Fe-ego if this was the case. Although aixel apparently was there, so it's possible. But you also seem to have an understanding of information elements, which would probably make it more likely that you self-type right and you'd realize it if you were indeed weak at Feeling; on top of that, starting a type debate wasn't something I wanted anyway, since real life and forum persona may be very different things and if you say you're Fe-subtype and 4w3, you have probably some good reasons for that. So, I suppose it's not something to be taken too seriously, but at the same time I needed to say it.