the boy who refused to grow up. type him!
http://i43.tinypic.com/wb9pow.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/jhdhud.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/rj4e8p.jpg
SLE? or maybe Alpha?
Printable View
the boy who refused to grow up. type him!
http://i43.tinypic.com/wb9pow.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/jhdhud.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/rj4e8p.jpg
SLE? or maybe Alpha?
IXFp lol
Some sort of EXTp. For some reason (socionics?), I could never quite fully wrap my arms around him. Now that I think about it, in the stories about him I usually am more interested in Wendy or her two brothers, or even Captain Hook, than I am in Peter. Tinkerbell's an odd little thing, too... I do think the stories are fun, though.
I'm thinking Alpha, most likely ENTp. Can't say that I've read the original work, though.
ILE for sure. just look at that dopey grin.
xLE makes sense. At first I was thinking Alpha, just because he seems all light-hearted and fun, but if you think about what he says and does, he never really thinks deeply about his actions, and doesn't seem all that interested in abstract thought. He prefers action to contemplation. He goes around having fun, battling Captain Hook, and doing a lot of aggressively playful things. I could see him as a youthful SLE.
[Edit: C-SLE, for those who care.]
I don't think this is Beta, it's Alpha. I mean childhood values in that, that's the epitome of Alpha right not Beta.
I agree that Wendy is IEI though. Only because my little niece LOVES her and I really think she's my Identical.
I'm just putting out another vote for SLE, at least for the Disney Classic.
I think the story itself has a lot of Alpha overtones, for sure. But seriously, think of what a youthful, "innocent" SLE would be like -- would he not be very much like Peter? Impish, playful, pulling pranks and getting into fights? He's a very physical character, while ILEs are more mental and abstract in their creativity.
But look at how he fights - dodging everything, striking back with weak blows that mostly just sting. He never actually hurts Hook, except in the ego, nor does he ever get hit (I have a nagging suspicion he does, but if so, I can't call it to mind right now). Se would be more about tanking, I would think. :)
On the contrary, I think that shows a very deft use of Se. He has great control over his ability to use force, and he can modulate the degree to which he uses it. An ILE would be clumsier -- either using way too little force, or way too much force, and not having enough control.
If I recall correctly, Peter never really gets angry at Hook -- he views the whole thing as an amusing game. He's having fun with Hook, not trying to kill him.
Hook must be LSI . . . he has a rocking mustache
I'm working on a Peter Pan show at the moment and have been thinking along similar lines of a lot of the people here. I agree SLE most likely, over ILE on the basis that he really is very concrete in his thoughts and actions. Whilst he is juvenile, this does not for me at least place him in the Alpha camp, in fact the dogmatic approach to retaining youthfulness is more beta in my opinion. I struggle to see SEI as his irrational extraversion (again from the version I'm seeing) is perhaps the most striking characteristic. He is high energy, he is impulsive. I've been kind of thinking that Hook (in the version I'm working on at least) seems gamma NT.
SLE, E7? I haven't read the book.
* KeroZen stuffs Aleksei's mouth with pieces of mustache and some super-glue!
When I was watching the Disney film, Peter always struck me as being very cruel. Considering that my IEI flatmate is head-over-heals in love with him, I'd probably go with SLE.
SLEs can be big kids too.