Would someone please tell me how to figure out my quad type? Better yet, could you please explain the theory to me, briefly?
Thank you!
Printable View
Would someone please tell me how to figure out my quad type? Better yet, could you please explain the theory to me, briefly?
Thank you!
Is quad type the extra bit of (function) going on.. say like an INFp having extra Ne???
Tests aren't very common in the Socionics typology, especially in English, and in any language that aren't reliable. Dual type is essentially an effort to capture both a person's "true" type and how they appear to and interact with others. (in more "technical" socionics terms, capture both their EM (energy metabolism) and IM (information metabolism))
ENTp-INFp-ISTp-INTp
But I'm just picking types I like.
lol but they have to be from all four quadrassssssssssssssssssssss
also hi. I broke my promise. But I am evading flame wars.
Check out your model number. It should be in "Q####" format.
http://mypieceoftheinter.net/wp-cont...ore-2-quad.jpg
Dual-typing is Tcaud's thing, and Tcaud is confusing. Labcoat might understand it, as he discussed it with Tcaud in the old days... I'd tell you to go ask Tcaud, but I'm pretty sure that you've already done that (and gotten no answer). Hmm, actually I have some memories of Tcaud's wiki posts on the topic...
Your dual-type describes what each of your functions think about. So if you use :Fe: to think about :Te:-related things and keep your :Si: very stereotypically to its natural domain, then you'd be ESE-LSE. Supposedly that would also mean that you use :Fi: on :Ti: topics, :Se: on :Se: topics, :Ti: on :Fi: topics, etc. Basically, overlap your actual type on top of your secondary type; the function on top is the way you think, and the function on bottom is what you think about.
I recall Tcaud typing Expat as LIE-ESE on the idea that Expat thought about :Fi::Se: in introspection (supposedly related to the id)... I was of the opinion that Expat was just contemplating his super-id values, but whatever.