Socionics Temperaments (description by poli)
You may want to relocate this post based on whatever accepted constitution arises from the users of Model A. I redefined the four temperaments into a four component scheme, where the first component (EJ temperament) traditionally signifies the original step of production, and the other three follow in order. It came to me first in a visualization of the temperaments in their finer forms, static/dynamic, and extroverted/introverted. Since extroverted functions seek change and initiative, the E temperaments provide the initial influence, where EJs create the physical limits, logically by admitting methods, and EPs pinpoint and originate an initial basis for an axiom. The E temperaments move onto initiating trades and new ideas, while the I temperaments stay back to organize and perfect the system. This ordering of the temperaments does not mean necessarily that the E temperaments can not organize an already existent system, for this will naturally happen when trades (the tools for methods) make some original methods more available to new systems (when the dynamic flow choses to enter previous realms, looks for new passages from older grounds). The I temperaments can also originate new rules for traditional schemes, for example when their becomes error in IJ framework, or when IPs begin to combine their methods to gain new insights into reconstructing a framework. Temperaments are also designated by specific behaviors classified into common definitions, however I intend to specify the overall implication of their behaviors. The pertaining definitions are generalized and concise. They do not account for every theoretical circumstance, but intend to attach common behavior to a reasoning behind each directive dichotomy (ethics, logic, intuition, and sensing.)
EJ - the Progressors ~ signified by ethical and logical endurance
The EJ-Progressors seek new methods to expand their industries. They provide the force to open new doors for the EP-Deciders and a stable base for construction for the IJ-Organizers. It is their responsibility to designate latest enhancements into a position of power in order to initially progress situations into new spheres of potential.
EP - the Deciders ~ signified by intuitive or sensory assertion
It's the EP-Deciders job to explore new areas provided by previous EJ-Progressor methods and to choose as to which systems will be originated and imposed for future generations to specialize. It is their responsibility to assume appropriate genres, that their new initiations are of enough significance in comparison with their old, and that they remain original wherever applicable, or else energy will be reused on old systems which will eventually become unsuitable.
IJ - the Organizers ~ signified by ethical or logical comprehension
The IJ-Organizers are the ones who specialize in a given system previously originated by the EP-Deciders. It is their job to search for all implications of the system and to perfect it into a personal or logical framework. It is the responsibility of the IJ to justify society's formations to assure future consideration of them into ruling.
IP - the Preservers ~ signified by intuitive or sensory philosophy
The IP-Preservers assist the IJ-Organizers by providing a dynamic flow in contrast to constructing their situated model. This dynamic flow is comprised of advanced methods that aid energy from one model to another, overall stabilizing finely specialized developments in frameworks and perceiving connections drawn from them. It is their responsibility to improve methods of drawing relevant connections to means, and to assess and share these means, or else existent systems will have no vision to improve on.