Education and Personalities
Should the education system use Socionics as guideline
Create different classrooms and topics for each type
Seperate them in this manner
------------------------------------
NP Classroom - Flexible class with little structure, teach things visually and introduce interesting theories
SP Classroom - Little structure, teach practical things in a hands on manner
SJ Classroom - Basically teach these students in the same manner they do now
NJ Classroom - Emphasize complex theories and structure
Okay, I know this is like segregation, but it is just a whacky idea and I want to know what you guys think of it. Anyways, they have segregation already by putting levels for each grade.
Can this work if implemented, or are there too many problems?
Re: Education and Personalities
Re: Education and Personalities
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young_and_Confused
NP Classroom - Flexible class with little structure, teach things visually and introduce interesting theories
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Give me that SP or NJ classroom instead. I simply cannot learn visually. At all. Never works out. I'd fail dismally. (This has been tried, when a teacher switched methods to accomodate the visual learners that made up the rest of the class. I didn't fail dismally but my marks slipped from the 90-100 range to the 50-60 range).
Re: Education and Personalities
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young_and_Confused
Should the education system use Socionics as guideline
Create different classrooms and topics for each type
Seperate them in this manner
------------------------------------
NP Classroom - Flexible class with little structure, teach things visually and introduce interesting theories
SP Classroom - Little structure, teach practical things in a hands on manner
SJ Classroom - Basically teach these students in the same manner they do now
NJ Classroom - Emphasize complex theories and structure
Okay, I know this is like segregation, but it is just a whacky idea and I want to know what you guys think of it. Anyways, they have segregation already by putting levels for each grade.
Can this work if implemented, or are there too many problems?
i'm not totally up on the theories - i'm INTJ - i think in pictures, learn by hands on, audio and visual. so according to this list, i'm almost all of them.
i would rather learn or teach what people would actually need. complex theories confuses most people - often you need that visual memory to understand many of them.
Re: Education and Personalities
Quote:
Originally Posted by ishysquishy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young_and_Confused
NP Classroom - Flexible class with little structure, teach things visually and introduce interesting theories
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Give me that SP or NJ classroom instead. I simply cannot learn visually.
At all. Never works out. I'd fail dismally. (This has been tried, when a teacher switched methods to accomodate the visual learners that made up the rest of the class. I didn't fail dismally but my marks slipped from the 90-100 range to the 50-60 range).
out of curiousity - what were some of the lessons like? most of my teachers never taught in pictures. so i'm not sure what kinds of lessons they use now. do you remember any?
Re: Education and Personalities
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike_INTJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by ishysquishy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young_and_Confused
NP Classroom - Flexible class with little structure, teach things visually and introduce interesting theories
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Give me that SP or NJ classroom instead. I simply cannot learn visually.
At all. Never works out. I'd fail dismally. (This has been tried, when a teacher switched methods to accomodate the visual learners that made up the rest of the class. I didn't fail dismally but my marks slipped from the 90-100 range to the 50-60 range).
out of curiousity - what were some of the lessons like? most of my teachers never taught in pictures. so i'm not sure what kinds of lessons they use now. do you remember any?
The teacher was very big on colour. Everything was colour coded, it was quite distressing! I just got distracted/confused/over-stimulated. I really can't cope with much in the way of visual information.
There was also diagrams, I couldn't remember a picture if my life depended on it. Plus I don't relate very well to diagrams. It was much better when she was just lecturing or if there was something we could "play" with. Real skeletons as opposed to pictures of skeletons. I need to touch objects in order to relate to them, diagrams are meaningless.
Also she used diagrams to represent information and thought processes (not just concrete things). I don't relate to that, either, and because she didn't do much else presentation-wise, I had to come up with my own way of learning the information and because she was doing it visually in the first place, my understanding was inherently flawed when I went to do my own thing. It did not work out!
Re: Education and Personalities
Quote:
Originally Posted by ishysquishy
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike_INTJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by ishysquishy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young_and_Confused
NP Classroom - Flexible class with little structure, teach things visually and introduce interesting theories
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Give me that SP or NJ classroom instead. I simply cannot learn visually.
At all. Never works out. I'd fail dismally. (This has been tried, when a teacher switched methods to accomodate the visual learners that made up the rest of the class. I didn't fail dismally but my marks slipped from the 90-100 range to the 50-60 range).
out of curiousity - what were some of the lessons like? most of my teachers never taught in pictures. so i'm not sure what kinds of lessons they use now. do you remember any?
The teacher was very big on colour. Everything was colour coded, it was quite distressing! I just got distracted/confused/over-stimulated. I really can't cope with much in the way of visual information.
There was also diagrams, I couldn't remember a picture if my life depended on it. Plus I don't relate very well to diagrams. It was much better when she was just lecturing or if there was something we could "play" with. Real skeletons as opposed to pictures of skeletons. I need to touch objects in order to relate to them, diagrams are meaningless.
Also she used diagrams to represent information and thought processes (not just concrete things). I don't relate to that, either, and because she didn't do much else presentation-wise, I had to come up with my own way of learning the information and because she was doing it visually in the first place, my understanding was inherently flawed when I went to do my own thing. It did not work out!
interesting. your like me in school - but in reverse. where everything was taught in words - and not pictures. not much to touch or look at. i did best in science and some math. but the other classes, really bad. it wasn't until i got out of school, and the internet came around. that's when i really taught myself stuff.
learning a new language also opened my eyes in how i read something. apparently my eyes jump all over words. i seem to locate pattern structures over what the word actually says. it explains a lot...