I'm jumping ship

Don't mean to burst your bubble, Joy, but being voluptuous does not make one "cool." "Cool" is a state of mind, not a state of tits.

I've never really seen the value in "coolness", to be honest.

Actually, I take that back. If we're talking about cool as in being calm, cool, and collected, then yes. I see the value.

If we're talking about cool as being well thought of socially, then the value is lost on me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilly

Don't mean to burst your bubble, Joy, but being voluptuous does not make one "cool." "Cool" is a state of mind, not a state of tits.

---

:Si: PoLR!!! :p

j/k

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilly

He's not delta but lol anyways :lol:

---

Oh, I know. I was just speaking generally. Ne-INTj ftw (the Si focus...lol).

Jesse seems to have this style of interaction where he says something that incites people, or starts a confrontation, and then when it actually becomes confrontational he removes himself from it, later coming back with some curt comment which ostensibly demonstrates control and maturity. I think it's similar to stickam, where he would get defensive when ashton was challenging his type, and when ashton got aggressive, he would start doing some nervous laugh thing. Same vibe. Se polr ftw. An ESTj would at least try to uphold their machismo-ness.

TIME TO JUMP SHIP AND MOVE TO ANOTHER QUADRA, WHO'S WITH ME?

http://www.domainnamenews.com/images/titanic.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joy

Why would they feel threatened by such an attitude? Nick is pretty much saying "Your Se, Ti, Fe, and Ni suck". The appropriate response from a Si, Te, Fi, and Ne perspective would be "lol... and your point is?"

It would be like me telling you that your tits aren't voluptuous enough and your legs are too hairy to look good in a short skirt.

---

That's just it; it wasn't about being "threatened". It's annoyance - you don't "smack" someone because you feel threatened (think of smacking someone upside the back of their head). It's being annoyed at how not valuing those things was cast in a negative light.

@strrrng

I'm not saying things to incite people. If you think these are my motives you have misunderstood me. I remove myself from the conversation when it gets confrontational because this was not my purpose in starting the discussion. My purpose is to seek worthwhile information. When things escalate, I just don't deem it worthwhile to my pursuits. This is not about Se-PolR, or being too scared to participate. It's about just not caring or seeing it as useful, beneficial (Te).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UDP

@strrrng

I'm not saying things to incite people. If you think these are my motives you have misunderstood me. I remove myself from the conversation when it gets confrontational because this was not my purpose in starting the discussion. My purpose is to seek worthwhile information. When things escalate, I just don't deem it worthwhile to my pursuits. This is not about Se-PolR, or being too scared to participate. It's about just not caring or seeing it as useful, beneficial (Te).

---

You're justifying your position a lot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mercutio

You're justifying your position a lot.

---

So? What is he supposed to do? This isn't necessarilly a situation of UDP "rationalizing" his LSEness. I mean, is there any response that would have made you think he wasn't?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ritella

So? What is he supposed to do? This isn't necessarilly a situation of UDP "rationalizing" his LSEness. I mean, is there any response that would have made you think he wasn't?

---

well-put

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JuJu

well-put

---

Really? Can you reword for me then: I don't understand.