_
Printable View
_
Just by VI, I'd say SEE.
It is not an easy typing from my perspective. Many of his more advanced political proposal (so, excluding for a moment the more techincal papers) seem to have a negativistic ethical bent which, at first, made me tend towards ENFp as a typing - plus VI's an irrational, and possibly as an extravert too (even if this is more dubious). On the other hand I could also see a gamma NT being technical and detached when approaching the subject from a theorethical point of view, yet marking his more personal and audience-related contributions with an ethical signature. I would, in any case, exclude all the merry types.
So what's the opinion of the international monetary fund?
My college asked me to read him. He's ESE.
ILE was my first impression based on VI, but I know nothing about the guy. LIE is also plausible...