Originally Posted by
dolphin
Do you guys believe this is the type of rationale normally offered by SEIs?
I was under the impression that Bee was offering Gilly a nice compliment, not really intending it as an actual rationale, persay. Or maybe she did, and I'm assuming too much.
But I'm curious to know as to why Ezra would apply it as a universal judgement to SEIs. I'm curious as to why he would believe that "true" SEIs use Bee's example as a way to determine type - rather than using examples, anectdotes, and theoretical knowledge as a type indicator.