Jung's cognitive functions test
eh well
I also know it's MBTI, which is why we can't take their suggestions for type to mean anything. Here's the link: http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/as...nt/survey.html
Quote:
Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) ******************** (20.2)
poor use
introverted Sensing (Si) ********* (9.6)
unused
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) *********************************************** (47.6)
excellent use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ************************************************ (48.6)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ************************ (24.2)
average use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ****************************************** (42.7)
excellent use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ****************** (18)
poor use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ***************************** (29.1)
average use
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: INTP
Lead (Dominant) Process
Introverted Thinking (Ti): Gaining leverage (influence) using a framework. Detaching to study a situation from different angles and fit it to a theory, framework or principle. Checking for accuracy. Using leverage to solve the problem.
Support (Auxilliary) Process
Extraverted Intuiting (Ne): Exploring the emerging patterns. Wondering about patterns of interaction across various situations. Checking what hypotheses and meanings fit best. Trusting what emerges as you shift a situation’s dynamics.
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ENTP, or INFP
Re: I know we've done it before
Quote:
(Ni) ************************************************ (48.6)
(Ne) *********************************************** (47.6)
(Ti) ****************************************** (42.7)
(Fi) ***************************** (29.1)
(Te) ************************ (24.2)
(Se) ******************** (20.2)
(Fe) ****************** (18)
(Si) ********* (9.6)
Quote:
(Ne) ********************************************** (46.8)
(Ni) *************************************** (39.5)
(Ti) ************************************** (38.7)
(Fi) ****************************** (30.6)
(Fe) *************************** (27.4)
(Se) *********************** (23.5)
(Si) ****************** (18)
(Te) **************** (16.1)
Why do these look so similar?
Re: I know we've done it before
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joy
Why do these look so similar?
I think CBT is messing with me.