Quote:
Originally Posted by
LevKamensky
This rational presentation is exclusively valid for the rational types; it by no means applies to the irrational
No duh.
Quote:
whose rapport is based not at all upon judgment but upon the parallelism of actual living events. His feeling of accord is the common perception of a sensation or intuition! A rational would complain that the rapport with the irrational depends purely upon chance.
This can make sense, I think, but when one actually take tiny chat into account, it doesn't sound okay.
Quote:
To the rational type it is often a very bitter thought that the relationship will last only just so long as external circumstances accidentally produce a mutual interest. This does not occur to him as being especially human[...]
What?
Quote:
Such a result, however, is reached only when one consciously tries to make some estimate of the nature of one's relationships with one's fellow-men. But a psychological conscientiousness of this kind is by no means usual. Usually a kind of fake rapport is reached through projection: one assumes with unspoken projection that the other is, in all essential points, of the same opinion as himself, while the other intuits or senses a common interest. A rapport of this kind is by far the most frequent; it rests upon projection, which is the source of many subsequent misunderstandings.
I found korpsey in temperaments, this isn't that missed.
Quote:
A relationship, in the extraverted attitude, is always regulated by objective factors and outer determinants. What a man is within has never any decisive significance.
[Note: all this brings me to a clear realization that a person does not just have a single psychological type but is more or less a system of alternating types…]
Jung has spoken, still don't know what he means. For an introverted temperament to have a "system, yes, system of alternating types, it enables it to have extraverted rational types as well, and when it enables/encourages(?) that, the whole point, that is, the difference between extraverted rational temperaments and introverted irrational one, is moot.
Quote:
[...]In their own way, men with such an attitude are educators and promoters of culture.
Cool.
Quote:
enjoying and poeticizing the cubic content of experience.]
Would like to know what Lev actually copied here, I mean what does this mean? I can write phallusising the developed embrace and futurism, but I don't know what that means as well, so wonder whether somebody actually does.