Wow astral, that was really an awesome description of LSIs. But I still don't see how that really ties in with Mr. Beckham, not that I even care.
I just liked the description.
Printable View
Wow astral, that was really an awesome description of LSIs. But I still don't see how that really ties in with Mr. Beckham, not that I even care.
I just liked the description.
I don't have any special interest in him, either (apart from affirming his type, so as to encourage consensus on the model here).Quote:
Originally Posted by eunice
Do you have a type for him, though? I said ISTj. How does he fit in with your notes/observations?
Thank you, you're really kind!Quote:
Originally Posted by ScarlettLux
hahhaaaaahaaa.. :D Really. I don't smile ALL the time. :D (although I'm smiling now)Quote:
Originally Posted by LokiVanguard
Astral's description seems perfect for LSI's-Ti. Yet, I see nothing of Beckham in it.
Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by FDG
No way! That's not a real picture, is it???Quote:
Originally Posted by hkkmr
Whoa . . . OK :DQuote:
Originally Posted by hkkmr
Oh my cheesy puffs - you can't get more beta than that!Quote:
Originally Posted by hkkmr
By the way, I only know of Beckham after seeing him on TV recently and thought, finally - another celeb ISTj to cite. His demeanor, facial expressions, vi etc PERFECTLY fit the people I've known that I've described on p.5, such that I am 100% sure that whatever their type, it's one and the same for all these folks.
Since I believe that VI works, I'd say David is an ENFp: he looks like an ENFp friend of mine and they share some traits such as inability to learn foreign languages and a preference for wearing flashy clothes. They are also prone to lose their nerve easily.
honestly, same here. i don't know why but it makes me think twice about v.i.-ing (or typing) ethical men as ethical at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by ifmd95
Funny, all the ENFps I know tend to have a natural flair towards learning foreign languages.Quote:
Originally Posted by 1981slater
As a nation, the UK lags behind other European nations in learning a foreign language. This may be or may not be connected to Beckham not learning another language.
Perhaps the (ability) or more so the desire to learn a second language could be connected to Te seeking in ENFp's, and Ne fufilling for the experience of the new culture and such tied in with that 'new' language.
*tangent*
Perhaps with that in mind, the desire of travel within ISTp's is Ne seeking, and language learning ENFp is Te seeking. I could see therefore how ENFp-ISTp could complement each other in that regard. Just a thought.
:Ti: PoLR types tend to be real assholes when it comes to language learning. David Beckam lived in Spain for almost five years and he wasn' able to speak half a word of Spanish. But I accept this may be not related to type but to IQ, motivation or even his easy mother tongue.
I've had about enough of these two guys also :) but I wouldn't rule out ISTj for her. If the showbiz does attract her for a dual seeking purpose then it could be Fe seeking as ifmd95 suggested earlier. This would give beneficiary to her from Beckham, who would also supply Fe in that intertype (if he is ISFp)
I still wouldn't rule out the INFp (typing I put forward earlier) for him. If she is ISTj, relation of activity would suit them well. And I do see Se in action with her, rather than looking for it, she would appear to look more for the Fe, (and giving out the Se)
Of course her being ESTp would suit well also.
I think we can agree that his Ti is weak, which wouldn't suit with the ISTj. It could be that he's got a low IQ, but then he's showed himself to be clever in other ways by answering media questions, making himself a good marketing machine, so I'm not convinced he is 'silly' or at least not an average IQ, if not more, he's just lower on the Ti and I would also say the TeQuote:
Originally Posted by ifmd95
Uhm, what do you mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by ifmd95
Anyway you have all made also good points towards ISFp. Now I do not really know anymore which one of the two is correct.
I was thinking about this on the bus today when I saw them together in the paper. For a public couple, they've stayed together for a remarkably long time. Whatever relations they have, I think they're very good. I don't think David values Se/Ni, and if Victoria does, she'd be his semi-dual or something. I was considering SEI (and so then considered ILE for Victoria - no chance) and LSE for him, and so thought about a Te/Fi type for her. To be honest, I really don't know. I think she could easily be of the IJ temperament, and I doubt IP, just by the way she moves and talks. EJ and EP I'm open to. For him, I could see any temperament except maybe IJ.
Type Victoria and David Beckham.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKtJIzdK4T4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K91NMY0YX4s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyiwH8bdFCs
She's a hot LSI lol
no ide a about him
Victoria Beckham - Ti-ISTJ
David Beckham - Fe-INFP
Nah, MBTI is wrong. It doesn't get to have anything.
David Beckham - LSI
Victoria Beckham - SLE
Victoria looks SEI to me.
Don't know why....I don't find them attractive, and they seem boring and pretentious to me.
Putting my personal sentiments aside, I think they are Ti-ISTj (Victoria) and Fe-INFp (David).
He seems to be an STj type...which would you guys vote for LSI, making Victoria SEI would be his benefit relations or ESTj/LSE, making SEI Victoria his Supervision - this would be a really tough relationship.
OK I'm leaning to:
Victoria Beckham SLI
Him LSE
She is so great. David Beckhams voice is so girly. It's creepy
:thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by jessica129
LSI-Ti --- SLI
I don't have any intertype explanation ...not that one is needed.
http://i1.bstatic.de/sites/default/f...tok%3DBhIRx6VF
I'd guess her as LSI-Se sp/sx 3
... and him as SEE-Fi sx/so 7
While she is his "supervisor" in socionics, he is her "upstream/benefactor" stacking and a match by the enneagram - an example of how socionics supervision marriages can actually work out, taking other personality systems into account.
Awww, look how in love they were in the first video :)
Imo she's LSI and he seems SEI.
I've changed my mind - SEE-Fi for him and LSI for her must be correct.
I would say this and final :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Saoshyant
Meaning your final opinion, or meaning people shouldn't discuss any further because you said it's final?Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritsa
;)
I could see LSI for Victoria easily. Not as sure on David, but I think IEI is most likely.
idk, i thought they were duals, EIE for Victoria and LSI for David.
Wanted to add, Victoria also reminds me with her British accent of Emma Watson. They also seem to think/react/respond to questions similarly. I know some people considered Beta ST for Emma Watson as well.
Can they be the same type???Quote:
Originally Posted by William
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/sit...emiere_a_p.jpg
http://cdni.condenast.co.uk/720x1080...b_720x1080.jpg
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1653793/th...2014-570.jpg?8
http://marieclaire.media.ipcdigital....-Beckham-1.jpg
http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/...on1-466758.jpghttp://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/...6242866145.jpg
http://marieclaire.media.ipcdigital....on-Dior-G2.jpg
http://www.standard.co.uk/incoming/a...riabeckham.jpg
http://www.independent.co.uk/incomin...tson-Getty.jpg
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/...eckham-001.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...annes_2013.jpg
http://i1.cdnds.net/12/43/618x958/pa-1485686.jpg
Easy typing.
Victoria is EIE and David is LSI.
Victoria Beckham - INFP
Emma Watson - INTJ