a lot of the sx/sp examples on the list don't even post here any more so it's not too hard to narrow things down. One thing to remember is that I'm looking at different fixations. A sx/sp 3, for example, can be a lot more exposing than say a sx/so 5....heck, even a sp/sx 3 that was deprived of mirroring in childhood can seem more self-revealing in contrast to a sx/so 5, so there's this thing called the actual enneagram type that will mean people of the same stack in different types won't match you exactly and that yes, you may find somebody of a different stack that seems more exhibitionistic that you. So it's more about looking it at a layer more relevant to stack. It's because i have to point these obvious things out to you that I call you simple-minded.
Also keep in mind sx/sp will be self-exposing with people they have a stronger chemistry with....this will come out more in chat since it's more 'for your eyes only'. After a certain amount of lines in chat the dialogue disappears from the chat box. So it's a more intimate setting where a sx/sp would do more revealing. On forum posts, your content has a more diffusive quality than theirs do. You speak more in generalities and your self-expositions are pop-culturey, for lack of a better term. Pop-culturey means exhibitionistic, more intended for an audience. Content is the first place where this shows up to me. The sx/sp aren't exhibitionistic in their self-revealing. They are having a private moment here on the forum (journaling private revelations inside their diary) and the audience is getting to peek inside. It's something bubbling up to the surface from deeper inside of them and you've got a window in rather than them constructing a narrative out of the events in their life. sx/sp self-exposition has been incubating internally for awhile, so by time its received on the board the content is more layered, refined, specific, in some cases giving an illusion that it has come out of a more ancient place and contains a pearl of wisdom that makes sx/sp a more sage-like stack than sx/so. You aren't coming from as deep of a place.
In this below quote, you show a stronger orientation to the
group than sx/sp's do and a sense for the way people connect socially. Below what you describe is the role that so/sx and sx/so typically assume in terms of being the group mascot.
Your self-exposure has a bawdier quality as seen
here:
Framing yourself as soft and cuddly is part of EII Te-seeking and very, very common to the way that EII's describe themselves and the way they like to be thought of. Simple-mindedness, like being soft and cuddly, is also essential to the way that EIIs instinctively seek Te. EII unconsciously seeks Te is by saying things that suggest they are simple-minded, so LSE will step in to gladly show them the points they are missing.It's Te-seeking and goes back before to what I said about you being simple-minded. LSE makes a nice dual for you because you need a coach to explain things to you and work with you and your soft, cuddly self in a thoughtful, 'coachly' fashion.
A more subtle example for your sx/so exhibitionism is right here on this thread. You grasp at straws desperately hoping to entice me to talk more about you. "I guess its my irises' or 'maybe he's just trolling me' or 'he types me a nine because of my disassociative issues' stuff which you have no basis in reality for concluding as I had never stated any of those as my reason for typing you such. You set yourself up to be smacked down every time you say something that I'm going to respond to as flat out wrong and back up with various reasons. Try to recognize it as an attempt on your part to get me to talk about you. I don't mind, but remember not to bite the hand that feeds you as there will come a time that I will have to drastically reduce your supply.
sx/sp self-exposition also shows up more in context to the thread. I think you, more than anybody here, have used threads as opportunities to self-expose when the thread OP isn't directly calling for it. It's like you're reframing the OP's post to ask something specifically about your self. sx/sp types don't have a habit of doing this. sx/so is typically more narcissistic than sx/sp and requires more mirroring from the environment. a social laster wouldn't have a widespread social concern that others will use their typing on the list as an example for that type. I recall you went after IBTL/Lucy pretty good after she typed you INFj, hypocritically went after her mental stability, and encouraged her to go over to missing the point. A social laster wouldn't react like that to Lucy-in-the-Sky's typing of them unless they had a strong connection to her. You wear your relationships more out in the open than sx/sp does. When you dualised with Absurd for that period, a significant number of your posts revolved around amping up the energetic exchange between both yourself and him, with a lot of pinging back and forth. And before that, rat1. it's a little harder to gage who sx/sp experiences strong chemistry with because they don't lap it up in the social....the pinging back and forth in the social sphere is the main way you as sx/so get your social needs met through the sexual.Another aspect of your exhibitionism is your tendency to dramatize in the social arena, especially when your social flips to the anti-social. You will recall on an older thread titled hypocrites where you said that
I have real fucking problems and have been through things that most of you will never experience, in a hundred lifetimes!". Since that thread is locked, I won't have to screenshot it; however, I'd point out that all other quotations used above have also been made copies of through screenshot. You'll remember it was just recent that you took down a photo of yourself on the delta examples thread that was used for a comparison with the eyes of Jodi Arias -- a photo comparison that was up at moron crunchers for over a year.
