Edit: didn't read the whole list.
Ezra, you're a silly man, a silly man Ezra is, yes, he is a silly man.
Printable View
Edit: didn't read the whole list.
Ezra, you're a silly man, a silly man Ezra is, yes, he is a silly man.
lol @ the "EDIT" reaction
Ahahahaha, Nehemiah. :lol:
I'll tell you if you take Fe out of your signature.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
Bitch please! I ain' silly, foo'! You iz hardline trippin' brutha!
I actually am a 6, for the record.
noob, only idiots admit to being 6s. It's the insecure retard cult-susceptible idiot type.
Although I must say, your attachment to and promotion of the beliefs of others, particularly Christopher Hitchens and a few economists, is certainly 6ish.
ezra where/how did you get those names?
lol, as a 6, i am inclined to disagree. i don't understand what people seem to dislike about the 6 typing because not all 6's are phobic kiss-ass 6's. i do dislike the cult-susceptible bit though. where on earth do you get that? at any rate, only 6's like discojoe do that.
I would disagree too. I really dislike the anti-six sort of bias expressed whenever Enneagram is discussed on this forum. I don't think being a six is any more negative than the other E-types. I don't get it, why is six a target? It seems more respectable than many of the other types, IMO. To me, the identity/heart triad has always seemed more fundamentally insecure than sixes are. That's just my impression though. I've thought about whether or not I was a 6w7 rather than a 7w6 since I related to a lot of what they describe in sixes (Mostly about how they're capable of being contrasts, so it isn't anything that substantial).
I really like this bit I read about sixes recently. Actually Maria, it reminded me of you somewhat:
If you are a six, there is a good chance you aren’t going to believe a thing I’m about to say. I hope you’ll read it anyway because there might be something here worthwhile.
Chances are you read a lot. But you don’t really buy it. You don’t buy much, definitely don’t by this stupid website, or any of the gurus out there. Nope. But it is interesting, so you’ll give it a few more minutes of your time.
Sixes are the skeptics. Sixes are the ones in the back of the crowd shouting at the magician that it’s slight of hand. (Well, maybe not shouting, but nudging the people next to you who are in awe.)
Yes, it’s hard to pull one over on the six, because although you might seem like you believe it, you don’t. Not really.
I’ve known a whole bunch of sixes. Most of them I’ve really liked. I’ve had a few best friends that have been sixes. I guess being a seven myself with a six wing; I can kind of sympathize with the six. Part of me is that way too.
Sixes rarely believe that they are actually sixes. They are often found wondering if they might be something else because they are skeptical that they are sixes. This isn’t a mistake. This isn’t unusual.
Sixes make great friends because they are great listeners and often have a wonderful sense of humor. The sense of humor helps them get through the day because they see too much of the shady underbelly to pretend it’s not there.
As a six, you can smell hypocrisy and incongruence from a mile away. Especially if it’s inside of yourself. You might spend many waking hours pouring over your beliefs to ensure that they all align and agree.
I can't say its entirely accurate, unfortunately. I showed it to someone else and they said it seemed easy to relate to, so I'm not sure if it's actually that six-related. Everyone loves to characterize sixes as people who pathetically attach to things, but they can also be very detached too. Counterphobic, anyone?
rofl @ "you may wish to think on who I am." Sometimes your degree of hubris is absolutely hillarious.
WAAAAHHHH
What does living in the international chalice of cheese with an ex-stripper have to do with any of this?
1. lol @ 6 warz
2. I recognise that many of the people on this list are Sixes. I'm surprised by the amount of people who actually took the list seriously. However, I commend Gilly for latching on to the true meaning of the thread almost instantaneously, and far quicker than most. :lol:
...
Seriously, you really need to stop listening to Brilliand and read some socionics literature.
From here.
What does this mean?
How is a type confirmed? And what's up with the :Fe: and :Ne:?Quote:
:Te::Si::Fe::Ne:
Confirmed ESTj
If you naturally, comfortably, and happily "do" :Fe:, then you aren't ESTj. And you don't appear to know enough about Socionics to be able to offer confirmation.
There is no type that values all those functions. My best guess based on what I see here is that you don't know the difference between Ti and Te, and that you're some Alpha type.
Then you could be an ESTj who is confused about what Fe and Fi are. That would actually make some sense. Your leading functions are Te and Si, and your next most valued functions are Fi and Ne. But then you aren't strong at those - they're functions you like and use clumsily, but appreciate help with.
I'm a 5wcp6 sp =)
:Ti: = logicQuote:
Originally Posted by Allie
:Te: = efficiency
:Fi: = morals
:Fe: = any visible form of emotion
:Si: = body
:Se: = sex
:Ni: = godly vision
:Ne: = possibilities
There.
Maybe all nuns are gamma SF's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Allie
:Ti:= Structure, internal consistency, algebraic thinking. Basically, concentrating. I can do it, but would rather not. Brilliand does it for me.
:Te:= Productivity, efficiency, gathering information. Gathering information is my hobby. I've been collecting hundreds of people's socionics types. I roll my eyes at inefficient methods and like to always be making something with my time.
:Si:= Understanding physical surroundings. I notice things like different shades of color easily. When something doesn't look right, it really bugs me. I'm picky about food and the weather. I know how to subtly annoy people.
:Se:= Power, force, reacting quickly. When someone makes me mad, they can activate my black circle. I yell and kick. This one is also good at leadership.
:Fi:= Relationships, hidden feelings. Being able to tell how people feel when they're not showing it with black L. And caring.
:Fe:= Visible emotions. Pretty much self-explanatory. Since it's my role, I can start and stop using it like flipping a switch. One moment I'm showing my emotions very visibly, the next moment I have a straight face.
:Ni:= Good at making predictions, procrastination. Basically, time. I'm miserable when I procrastinate. I hate having debts that I have to pay later; I want them paid now so I don't have to remember them. Time tests drive me nuts if I can hear the clock ticking. I want to do things at my own pace in whatever order I want.
:Ne:= Possibilities, crazy ideas, variety. This one's also pretty self-explanatory. It's thinking outside the box and being creative.
Wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by directorabbie
Your definitions of the functions are wrong, dumbass. Now shut the hell up before you embarrass yourself more.Quote:
Originally Posted by directorabbie
You don't know what an INFp is, you clown. And most of them would have a field day with you.Quote:
Originally Posted by directorabbie
Yes, you've proved this beyond all reasonable doubt, lol.Quote:
I can embarrass myself all I want!
My definitions were jokes. Now you must feel stupid.Quote:
Your definitions were pretty close to mine.
All of them - duh.Quote:
Which do you disagree with?
No, I'm right about everything and you're wrong about everything. Anything else?Quote:
(You're proabably right about feeling and intuitive; I'm probably right about thinking and sensing.)
lol @ youQuote:
Originally Posted by directorabbie
You don't even know your own quadra functions. roflmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by directorabbie's sig
I put the shapes in my signature that I most commonly use. They're not to inform you, they're to make me happy. I already have the information about my type in my signature.
"lol @ you" means nothing. What do you find funny about it? The fact that I collect people's types, or the fact that I've only conflicted with two INFps?
Even if I am wrong about the meaning of the shapes (which I'm certain I'm not unless you can prove otherwise), it makes sense for them to have those meanings. I've been studying my classmates, and it all fits together. Even if it's not true socionics.
Strrrng's take on Fi and Te isn't all sunshine and happy days
*Oh*, function symbols make you feel "happy." Got it.Quote:
Originally Posted by DirectorAbbie
Why would an unvalued function make you feel happy?
I "lol" at your complete incompetence in dealing with socionics concepts.Quote:
"lol @ you" means nothing. What do you find funny about it? The fact that I collect people's types, or the fact that I've only conflicted with two INFps?
Just because something makes sense and fits a pattern, does not mean that pattern exists in reality. I could make up a theory classifying people based off of the size of their asses and find some random pattern that "made sense"; it still wouldn't depict reality.Quote:
Even if I am wrong about the meaning of the shapes (which I'm certain I'm not unless you can prove otherwise), it makes sense for them to have those meanings. I've been studying my classmates, and it all fits together. Even if it's not true socionics.
And you have a long way to go before you learn the reality of the information elements.
Anyone who refers to Se as "black circle" has evidently not studied socionics enough.
These descriptions are horrifically simplistic. They remind me of when I first joined the forum. Persist, and you shall learn. I wouldn't be surprised if you ended up as a Beta ST, actually.
I bet they wouldn't, actually. I could imagine Abbie being a Ti type.
My take on your existence isn't all sunshine and happy days
I bet they would, regardless of her type, lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezra
But isn't Se :Se:? That sure looks like a black circle to me.
Thanks, saying they're simplistig is a lot better than saying they're total garbage. I like simplicity. It doesn't require as much :Ti:, which gets boring. I don't think I'm a Ti. And I certainly don't want to be a beta.
Still amused at how Ezra typed me correctly on his joke list.
It is..! :) It is a black circle.
This is a new forum member (joined Aug 2008.) If someone would have written this to me when I first got here, I would've left.
A lot of longtime posters are leaving and a lot of new ppl aren't staying... Eventually, there will be about ten of us left, and this place will suck.
quiet you, I refer to :Se: as the burnt pancake of all the functions.
Not everyone can be as special as you.Quote:
These descriptions are horrifically simplistic. They remind me of when I first joined the forum. Persist, and you shall learn. I wouldn't be surprised if you ended up as a Beta ST, actually.
The way she explains is a very Ti way, but what do i know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezra
Thanks, JuJu! I plan to stick around, though. ESTs are good at being stubborn.
Burnt pancake? Okay...
:Se:Burnt Pancake
:Si:Sugar Cookie
:Te:Pandora's Box
:Ti:Book
:Fe:Level
:Fi:Roof
:Ne:Hat
:Ni:The Trinity
I like Ti explanations. Brilliand uses them, and they make sense. I'm not sure what a Te explanation would be. I'd probably confuse it with Si.
lols im not sp OR so ...
however im ignorant as to what counter phobic means anyway
Looks more like :Ne: to me.
@Ezra: Stop berating her about her terminology! I deliberately taught her different terminology in some cases, because I think my terminology is better. She knows how to convert, and you know how to convert from her terminology, so it's no big deal. What words she uses does not necessarily reflect on her understanding!
Now, I did refer her to this forum in the hope that she would better learn the bits that I left out, or couldn't explain well. But I don't like this business of trying to second-guess me and type her across the Internet as something that doesn't fit with our relationship.
Hi Khamelion, i'm not sure of the seriousness of this post, but, if the general thing being done isn't essentially correct, but you seem to say -it happened to someone so they can therefore do it to others, i'm wondering, do you think that two wrongs make a right?
This is so funny, Kelly. You are such an obvious Seven! We'll talk about it if you want, PM or not. I already mentioned it in another thread, but - by the title of this one - it seems like we could go on forever about anyone's type and not derail the thread :lol:.
Oh, God. The brother finally steps in. Complete with Ti nukes.
Not interested. You're wrong - I'm right.
me and bg are identicals.
<---Is similarly offended.
Is not offended becuase he got it right, hmm I wonder how he got it right. the answer might be beneath this sentence.
Am not a 3 :(
Ezra you are making lots of people sad.
Thanks, I was wondering what my wing was.
Well, mine is right.
Why the fuck do you still have me as 6w5, after our interactions through pm here and at the holy enneagram forum?
safety and lack of adventure?! :(
Goddamnit, Gillster, you are NOT a fuckin' Four.
AND RIGHTEOUSLY SO!
GOD WILLS IT!!!
http://www.kelticklankirk.com/templa..._battle_33.jpg
Oh, and THAT'S not a loaded question :p
FOR YOUR INFORMATION, I work my job at a coffee shop, and in my spare time I work on my book, ride my mountain bike, write poetry, play video games, and help my roommate edit his book.
My closest 4w3 friend, sx/so, isn't quite as active as me; he mostly does his job, plays video games, and writes lyrics and poetry. We have LOADS of common interests: obviously writing, but also psychology, philosophy, sociology, and personal development/excessive self-examination. We have similar on/off personalities; super-charged one minute, sullen and reclusive the next (both Oldham Artistic styles).
A 4w3 so/sx friend from school who I stay in touch with shares many interests and perspective with me in the realms of psychology and social phenomena, and has very similar tastes in literature/poetry; she and I used to run snarky side-reel-esque commentary on our 3w2 friend's behaviors and exploits, as well as with his 3w4 sidekick. The four of us were a mini-clique of sorts.
Another friend from school, 4w3 sx/sp, was probably the single person I have ever felt the most like in my entire life. We shared many perspectives on self-development, philosophy, religion, and social phenomena; my approach was slightly more concrete/scientific whereas his was more spiritual/religious, but nonetheless we had much in common both in the way of outward personality, inward beliefs, and general self-perception.
The 3s I know always seem too outer-directed to me, like they don't take any time to self-examine and see that they are living only for other people...in some ways I secretly fear that my 3-side will take me over and I will be totally caught up in whatever I throw myself at, but realistically, I don't have the drive or consistency for that to ever come to fruition. I admire them for their energy and determination, but at the same time, whenver I get to know a 3, I see an inevitable burn out, like they are running from something that they simply can't escape.
4w3s seem to be the most aristocratic, and balance the expression of their image with the preservation of their individuality. I kind of like having the 3 aspect attendant to the main fixation; I couldn't imagine it as my primary drive. Just adds a spark to shit. 4w5s are aristocratic too, but indifferent, and generally more unconcerned with the world. The ideals take a more intellectual form, so thinking, not expression, is what perpetuates them. 4w3s eventually collapse and feel that they are fake and worthless; 4w5s collapse and think they are worthless and futile. 3w4s are the most overtly aristocratic, yet eventually burn out and come to believe that they are completely empty.
And Gilly, I think 3w4 > 4w3. They don't all have to be power-hungry ladder-climbers and shit, lol. And I've never encountered an ENFj 4.