Labcoat proposes that the metabolism type (TIM) be called the "meta" type, while redubbing the exertion type as the "object" type.
I can see a strong case for meta, but object seems overused. Thoughts?
Printable View
Labcoat proposes that the metabolism type (TIM) be called the "meta" type, while redubbing the exertion type as the "object" type.
I can see a strong case for meta, but object seems overused. Thoughts?
I thought I already ran you off once.
Well at least you admitted to trying. Apparently you thought yourself above the ties that bind, eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilly
I'm tentatively settling on ENTp-ENFp for your dualtype. But ESFp exertion is another possibility.
I can answer the same by this question: are you naturally attentive to the ways people's paths cross, and what will happen when they do?
Dubious. I've seen him react to some of my writings in ways I've come to expect from people with conflicting exertion types. You know, taking words litterally when they shouldn't and vice versa.Quote:
I'm tentatively settling on ENTp-ENFp for your dualtype. But ESFp exertion is another possibility.
* deleted due to not being reliabe info *
* I currently interpret dynamics as "language", so you could say I need the most precise possible way of describing a system before I understand it.
BTW. Object/meta language is terminology from linguistics and analytical philosophy. They belong together so to use either and not the other is not generally a good idea. I'd want terms that conveys exactly the same meaning before I'd ever swap them for these.
Further: a hint for telling object-Ep's from others. We are constantly redefining our view of phenomena. We describe things by using chains of adjectives and brief tags that all characterize the same thing from different perspectives.
I'm using "meta" on the wiki. (and please critique the wiki, too)
http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?t...al-type_theory
What about 'dohickey' or 'widget'?Quote:
Originally Posted by tcaudilllg
isn't that that drugged out British musician guy?Quote:
Originally Posted by Subterranean
That's Doherty :).Quote:
Originally Posted by Bionicgoat
Those comments were rude and quite off-topic. They have no place in this thread.