the existence of static/dynamic aspects of reality
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elzo
I don't believe in static or dynamic functions.
I don't know if you mean functions or IM Elements or whatever... perhaps you can clarify... I'm going to assume that you're talking about aspects of reality though. We can work out the semantics when you post.
If there's no such thing static or dynamic aspects of reality, it means there cannot be 8 different aspects of reality.
The theory states:
extraverted intuition = internal statics of objects
extraverted sensing = external statics of objects
extraverted logic = external dynamics of objects
extraverted ethics = internal dynamics of objects
introverted intuition = internal dynamics of fields
introverted sensing = external dynamics of fields
introverted logic = external statics of fields
introverted ethics = internal statics of fields
If you remove the static vs dynamic aspect of these, you're left with:
internal of objects
external of objects
internal of fields
external of fields
My point is... it doesn't work. You have to have static/dynamic aspects of reality in order for the theory to work.
Re: the existence of static/dynamic aspects of reality
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elzo
I don't believe in static or dynamic functions.
I don't know if you mean functions or IM Elements or whatever... perhaps you can clarify... I'm going to assume that you're talking about aspects of reality though. We can work out the semantics when you post.
If there's no such thing static or dynamic aspects of reality, it means there cannot be 8 different aspects of reality.
The theory states:
extraverted intuition = internal statics of objects
extraverted sensing = external statics of objects
extraverted logic = external dynamics of objects
extraverted ethics = internal dynamics of objects
introverted intuition = internal dynamics of fields
introverted sensing = external dynamics of fields
introverted logic = external statics of fields
introverted ethics = internal statics of fields
If you remove the static vs dynamic aspect of these, you're left with:
internal of objects
external of objects
internal of fields
external of fields
My point is... it doesn't work. You
have to have static/dynamic aspects of reality in order for the theory to work.
Static/dynamic is sheer nonsense.
Grrr, socionics!
Re: the existence of static/dynamic aspects of reality
@ Joy
I was talking about actual functions (which are meant to be based on Information Elements).
Quote:
extraverted intuition = internal statics of objects
extraverted sensing = external statics of objects
extraverted logic = external dynamics of objects
extraverted ethics = internal dynamics of objects
introverted intuition = internal dynamics of fields
introverted sensing = external dynamics of fields
introverted logic = external statics of fields
introverted ethics = internal statics of fields
The info in the quote marks is just so abstract that its connection to current function descriptions is very weak. IMO Exxp and Ixxj perceive all the functions statically, and Ixxp and Exxj perceive all the functions dynamically.
I gave the example of Fe in this thread:
oldforumlinkviewtopic.php?t=14842
Re: the existence of static/dynamic aspects of reality
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elzo
IMO Exxp and Ixxj perceive all the functions statically, and Ixxp and Exxj perceive all the functions dynamically.
I very much agree.