How do subtypes affect intertype relationships?
I don't recall reading about how subtypes affect relationships other than in a mirror relationship.
If you were in a relationship with your identical, but had different subtypes, would the relationship be less boring?
Anyone have experience with this relationship?
I have a friend who tested INTJ on MBTI most of the time (other times she'd test INFJ and ISTJ, but INTJ most times) and I would test INTP, almost everytime. I figured whatever we were, we were the opposite of each other (If she was INTp then i was INTj, and vice versa). She definitely needs her outer world ordered, and I definitely have less of a grasp on time and personal organization.
Though we are different, she says i understand her best of all her friends. Otherwise, I don't feel I am with my identical when Im with her.
How subtypes affect intertype relations
What affect does your subtype have on your 5th and 6th functions?
For instance I am an ENTJ Intuitive Subtype. So that means out of
:Te: :Ni: :Fe: :Si: :Fi: :Se: :Ti: :Ne:
My :Te: is weaker than usual while my :Fe: is stronger.
But how does this affect the :Fi: :Se: , the things that I want from others? I theorize that having stronger :Fe: slightly negates the need for :Fi:, which leads to the need for :Se: having a priority. This fits with my desire for :Se: related things (money, power) being stronger than other ENTJs.
Thus my perfect dual would be an ISFJ sensory subtype, according to this reasoning. Hmmmmm.
Discuss.
Re: How subtypes affect intertype relations
Quote:
Originally Posted by pezzonovante
perfect dual ISFJ sensory subtype
Good luck with that :lol:
How do subtypes influence intertype relations
Generally speaking, is it more preferable for a mix of subtypes (rational and irrational subtypes), or the same rationality?
Re: Subtypes and Relations
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington
I thought it would be good to have a thread about this topic. I think now that subtypes can have a significant affect on a relation.
Please place examples and discussion here.
I have seen a smoother relationship with ENTjs who are logical subtype rather than intuitive. I think this does have to do with my preference for Ne (and corresponding discomfort with Se, which I would assume the intuitive subtype ENTj puts more emphasis on than the thinking subtype).
I have also seen significant difference in my relationships with different subtypes of my mirror, the ENTp. Also, INFp.
I have seen less extreme but noticeable differences with the different subtypes of ESFj, ISFp, and ISTp.
On one level this can seem extremely obvious but on another not so simple. One question I have been having is that in the case of extreme subtypes, do you think one class of relation can become "better" than another or do you think you must trek around looking for a dual with as an extreme subtype as you? Would the subtypes need to match or be opposite?
...That's it.
You moron, you are interpreting crosstype information as subtype information. Idiot.
If you want an answer to this question, see the crosstype theory and start typing RIGHT.
Re: Subtypes and Relations
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcaudilllg
...That's it.
You moron, you are interpreting crosstype information as subtype information. Idiot.
If you want an answer to this question, see the crosstype theory and start typing RIGHT.
how can crosstypes be correlated to subtypes ?
Re: Subtypes and Relations
Re: Subtypes and Relations
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcaudilllg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington
I thought it would be good to have a thread about this topic. I think now that subtypes can have a significant affect on a relation.
Please place examples and discussion here.
I have seen a smoother relationship with ENTjs who are logical subtype rather than intuitive. I think this does have to do with my preference for Ne (and corresponding discomfort with Se, which I would assume the intuitive subtype ENTj puts more emphasis on than the thinking subtype).
I have also seen significant difference in my relationships with different subtypes of my mirror, the ENTp. Also, INFp.
I have seen less extreme but noticeable differences with the different subtypes of ESFj, ISFp, and ISTp.
On one level this can seem extremely obvious but on another not so simple. One question I have been having is that in the case of extreme subtypes, do you think one class of relation can become "better" than another or do you think you must trek around looking for a dual with as an extreme subtype as you? Would the subtypes need to match or be opposite?
...That's it.
You moron, you are interpreting crosstype information as subtype information. Idiot.
If you want an answer to this question, see the crosstype theory and start typing RIGHT.
Hey now, no reason to insult msk! That's right, everyone else is wrong, and only you're right. As far as I've seen you haven't ever
clearly explained yourself or why you believe crosstypes are a more reasonable explanation than subtypes.
Shut up Diana. That's an order from one liberal to another.
And you will stand with me in support of the crosstype theory. You are acting foolish by feigning ignorance of it. Or are you not a liberal?
I warn that any who dare attempt to render all my hard work against adversity for nought will pay dearly for their transgression. This is fate and you cannot change it. I will succeed.
Re: Subtypes and Relations
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcaudilllg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington
I thought it would be good to have a thread about this topic. I think now that subtypes can have a significant affect on a relation.
Please place examples and discussion here.
I have seen a smoother relationship with ENTjs who are logical subtype rather than intuitive. I think this does have to do with my preference for Ne (and corresponding discomfort with Se, which I would assume the intuitive subtype ENTj puts more emphasis on than the thinking subtype).
I have also seen significant difference in my relationships with different subtypes of my mirror, the ENTp. Also, INFp.
I have seen less extreme but noticeable differences with the different subtypes of ESFj, ISFp, and ISTp.
On one level this can seem extremely obvious but on another not so simple. One question I have been having is that in the case of extreme subtypes, do you think one class of relation can become "better" than another or do you think you must trek around looking for a dual with as an extreme subtype as you? Would the subtypes need to match or be opposite?
...That's it.
You moron, you are interpreting crosstype information as subtype information. Idiot.
If you want an answer to this question, see the crosstype theory and start typing RIGHT.
I hope you're joking, because otherwise you are way way way out of line. 1. Calling anyone a moron or idiot, and 2. trying to force someone to follow your theory.
Re: Subtypes and Relations