Re: New Relationship names
I've made some remarks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitta
INTj---Dual----ESFj
INTj---Relation of Mutalistic Teachings/Activity-----ISFp TEACHINGS??
INTj---Mirror---ENTp
INTj---Look alike---ESTj ILLUSIONARY
INTj---Supervision-->ENFp
INTj<--Supervision---ESTp
INTj---Semi Duality---INFj LOOK A LIKE
INTj---Relation of Benefit--->ISTp
INTj<--Relation of Benefit---INFp
INTj---Relation of Creative Understanding---ENFj
INTj---Quasi-identical---INTp
INTj---Contrary---ENTj
INTj---Relation of Acceptance---ISTj
INTj---Super-Ego---ISFj
INTj---Conflicting---ESFp
Re: New Relationship names
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarno
I've made some remarks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitta
INTj---Dual----ESFj
INTj---Relation of Mutalistic Teachings/Activity-----ISFp TEACHINGS??
INTj---Mirror---ENTp
INTj---Look alike---ESTj ILLUSIONARY
INTj---Supervision-->ENFp
INTj<--Supervision---ESTp
INTj---Semi Duality---INFj LOOK A LIKE
INTj---Relation of Benefit--->ISTp
INTj<--Relation of Benefit---INFp
INTj---Relation of Creative Understanding---ENFj
INTj---Quasi-identical---INTp
INTj---Contrary---ENTj
INTj---Relation of Acceptance---ISTj
INTj---Super-Ego---ISFj
INTj---Conflicting---ESFp
INTj and ESTjs are look-alikes because they have the same base function and they actually have a similar appearance
The purpose of the supervision relationship in my opinion has been explained through my model... as the supervisor's dominant functions is the supervisee's main agenda.
The original look-alikes are actually my semi dualities because each of their dominant functions are the others dual seeking.
INTj and ISTjs don't understand each other but they accept the way each other are because of the creative functions being the others agenda.
Creative Understanding means that the types are liberal in similar ways.
And mutalistic teaching for the activity pair means that they are like each the supervisors and the supervisees for each other.
Re: New Relationship names
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitta
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarno
I've made some remarks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitta
INTj---Dual----ESFj
INTj---Relation of Mutalistic Teachings/Activity-----ISFp TEACHINGS??
INTj---Mirror---ENTp
INTj---Look alike---ESTj ILLUSIONARY
INTj---Supervision-->ENFp
INTj<--Supervision---ESTp
INTj---Semi Duality---INFj LOOK A LIKE
INTj---Relation of Benefit--->ISTp
INTj<--Relation of Benefit---INFp
INTj---Relation of Creative Understanding---ENFj
INTj---Quasi-identical---INTp
INTj---Contrary---ENTj
INTj---Relation of Acceptance---ISTj
INTj---Super-Ego---ISFj
INTj---Conflicting---ESFp
INTj and ESTjs are look-alikes because they have the same base function and they actually have a similar appearance
The purpose of the supervision relationship in my opinion has been explained through my model... as the supervisor's dominant functions is the supervisee's main agenda.
The original look-alikes are actually my semi dualities because each of their dominant functions are the others dual seeking.
INTj and ISTjs don't understand each other but they accept the way each other are because of the creative functions being the others agenda.
Creative Understanding means that the types are liberal in similar ways.
And mutalistic teaching for the activity pair means that they are like each the supervisors and the supervisees for each other.
Where the hell did you get that?? Are you talking MBTT??
INTjs and ESTjs do NOT have the same base function. It's :Te: :Si: (ESTj) and :Ti: :Ne: (INTj). How are they the same??
And the INTj's creative function is the ISTj's PoLR, and vice versa, not hidden agenda. :?
Re: New Relationship names
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mea
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitta
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarno
I've made some remarks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitta
INTj---Dual----ESFj
INTj---Relation of Mutalistic Teachings/Activity-----ISFp TEACHINGS??
INTj---Mirror---ENTp
INTj---Look alike---ESTj ILLUSIONARY
INTj---Supervision-->ENFp
INTj<--Supervision---ESTp
INTj---Semi Duality---INFj LOOK A LIKE
INTj---Relation of Benefit--->ISTp
INTj<--Relation of Benefit---INFp
INTj---Relation of Creative Understanding---ENFj
INTj---Quasi-identical---INTp
INTj---Contrary---ENTj
INTj---Relation of Acceptance---ISTj
INTj---Super-Ego---ISFj
INTj---Conflicting---ESFp
INTj and ESTjs are look-alikes because they have the same base function and they actually have a similar appearance
The purpose of the supervision relationship in my opinion has been explained through my model... as the supervisor's dominant functions is the supervisee's main agenda.
The original look-alikes are actually my semi dualities because each of their dominant functions are the others dual seeking.
INTj and ISTjs don't understand each other but they accept the way each other are because of the creative functions being the others agenda.
Creative Understanding means that the types are liberal in similar ways.
And mutalistic teaching for the activity pair means that they are like each the supervisors and the supervisees for each other.
Where the hell did you get that?? Are you talking MBTT??
INTjs and ESTjs do NOT have the same base function. It's :Te: :Si: (ESTj) and :Ti: :Ne: (INTj). How are they the same??
And the INTj's creative function is the ISTj's PoLR, and vice versa, not hidden agenda. :?
http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x...TrueModelA.jpg
Re: New Relationship names
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitta
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mea
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitta
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarno
I've made some remarks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitta
INTj---Dual----ESFj
INTj---Relation of Mutalistic Teachings/Activity-----ISFp TEACHINGS??
INTj---Mirror---ENTp
INTj---Look alike---ESTj ILLUSIONARY
INTj---Supervision-->ENFp
INTj<--Supervision---ESTp
INTj---Semi Duality---INFj LOOK A LIKE
INTj---Relation of Benefit--->ISTp
INTj<--Relation of Benefit---INFp
INTj---Relation of Creative Understanding---ENFj
INTj---Quasi-identical---INTp
INTj---Contrary---ENTj
INTj---Relation of Acceptance---ISTj
INTj---Super-Ego---ISFj
INTj---Conflicting---ESFp
INTj and ESTjs are look-alikes because they have the same base function and they actually have a similar appearance
The purpose of the supervision relationship in my opinion has been explained through my model... as the supervisor's dominant functions is the supervisee's main agenda.
The original look-alikes are actually my semi dualities because each of their dominant functions are the others dual seeking.
INTj and ISTjs don't understand each other but they accept the way each other are because of the creative functions being the others agenda.
Creative Understanding means that the types are liberal in similar ways.
And mutalistic teaching for the activity pair means that they are like each the supervisors and the supervisees for each other.
Where the hell did you get that?? Are you talking MBTT??
INTjs and ESTjs do NOT have the same base function. It's :Te: :Si: (ESTj) and :Ti: :Ne: (INTj). How are they the same??
And the INTj's creative function is the ISTj's PoLR, and vice versa, not hidden agenda. :?
http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x...TrueModelA.jpg
Right. I remember that thread. :8*