Subtypes of types: two or four?
Anyone else here sees 4 subtypes in each type? More like 2 sets of subtype, one set that concerns a general vibe and another that concerns the "area of thoughts/actions". The most obvious type in which i see it is INFp:
Some of them are very introverted and close to their hidden agenda because both their vibe and area of thoughts/actions is :Ni: oriented. We could call them "independent thinkers".
Another subgroup is more :Fe: oriented in it's approach while seeming to pursue it's own :Ni: agenda, using :Fe: to relate to people. The members of this group could be called "sowers/fighters of ideas/systems"
There's another subtype who is similar to the first but those who represent it clearly give off more respect to people in their surroundings, they value :Fe: and seem to use :Ni: to establish the :Fe: moods they cherrish more efficiently (And most importantly without the :Ni: agenda of the second subtype). Their more neutral stance makes the term "narrator" fit them.
Finally, there's the outgoing, social, almost vain subtype which lets very little place to :Ni: compared to the other subtypes, they don't seem to have as much energy/strength as the second subtype but they are definitely more extroverted. I can't think of a name right now. "Eccentric romantic" maybe?
So like:
Vibe --- Area of thoughts/action ---- Subtype ----------------------------------------- Example
:Ni: ---- :Ni: --------------------------- Independent thinker ----------------------------- (?)
:Fe: ---- :Ni: -------------------------- Sower/fighter of/for ideas/systems ------------- Krae
:Ni: ---- :Fe: -------------------------- Narrator ------------------------------------------- Baby(?)
:Fe: ---- :Fe: -------------------------- Eccentric romantic ------------------------------- [s:f5fb9e55f9]aurora_faerie[/s:f5fb9e55f9]
The examples i observed are people i know so i don't have many examples to share here, i tried my best to apply my observations on (ex)forum people but as it's probably obvious, i don't know many of them. I guess the short descriptions can be enough for a start in case some other people have noticed 4 subtypes too. There might be other possible divisions based on other factors but i think the ones i described above really stand out. It also removes the ambiguity from some people's subtype according to "traditional" subtype theories.