Chris' description of Fe is wonderful and captures something essential about Fe
Chris' description of Fe is OK and reflects a servicable understanding of socionics
Chris' description of Fe is utter bs and should be scrapped and rethought mostly from the ground up
Chris' description of Fi is wonderful and captures something essential about Fi
Chris' description of Fi is OK and reflects a servicable understanding of socionics.
Chris' description of Fi is utter bs and should be scrapped and rethought mostly from the ground up.
Chris' description of Te is wonderful and captures something essential about Te
Chris' description of Te is OK and reflects a servicable understanding of socionics
Chris' description of Te is utter bs and should be scrapped and rethought mostly from the ground up
Chris' description of Ti is wonderful and captures something essential about Ti
Chris' description of Ti is OK and reflects a servicable understanding of socionics
Chris' description of Ti is utter bs and should be scrapped and rethought mostly from the ground up
Chris' description of Ne is wonderful and captures something essential about Ne
Chris' description of Ne is OK and reflects a servicable understanding of socionics
Chris' description of Ne is utter bs and should be scrapped and rethought mostly from the ground up
Chris' description of Ni is great
Chris' description of Ni is great
Chris' description of Ni is great (just kidding. Click this one if you think it sucks).
Chris' description of Se is wonderful and captures something essential about Se
Chris' description of Se is OK and reflects a servicable understanding of socionics
Chris' description of Se is utter bs and should be scrapped and rethought mostly from the ground up
Chris' description of Si is wonderful and captures something essential about Si
Chris' description of Si is OK and reflects a servicable understanding of socioncs
Chris' description of Si is utter bs and should be scrapped and rethought mostly from the ground up