krieger
Ti centric

LSI, LIE or ILI, 1 of those is ur type. A write up on ur type I recently did: He has srsly considered ILI & LSI for himself in the past, & others have repeatedly suggested LSI. In old posts he also said he identifies w/ declarer & all romantic styles but infantile. He called delta boring in chatbox. He's no Fe or Se dom. He's E5 & schizoid/solitary oldham style. In an old post said 1 of his favorite quotes is the one by Ghenghis Khan about how the best in life is driving away your foe then have their women afterwards (Se valuing). He has said in chatbox (& in posts, IIRC) that he says blunts things outright in social situations, earning him ire (weak F). He once wondered aloud to himself in chatbox how anyone could enjoy some kinda Si-gathering. Logic is his strong point, so no ethics. He's a Nietzsche fan. Nietzsche is prolly IEI & Nietzsche fans on this site seem to never be delta. He once complained in chatbox about how in GoT u don't see the emotions of the chars becoming legible in their eyes, body language, etc. He shouted a link to some wild west movie where such becomes legible. Would a Fe-devaluer make such a specific complaint? Mb not. Overall LIE seems the least likely outta the 3.

Edit: also, u said u identify w/ result? LIE then. U even idealize ESIs in old threads. & u identify w/ emotivist over contructivist, IIRC. So it's definitely LIE then. & u said in the "alpha & leadership" that ur type, LII, make for good leaders. Se HA? U bet. Si is about parasympathic nervous system, Se about sympathetic nervous system. U clearly dislike the former. U also say proximate typings like XEE, LXI, etc are good, this fits well w/ the probabilistic philosophy of ILI. Thus, you gotta be Ni subtype if subtypes are to be included. You're less peak Te & delta then the opposite.

.

-

-

-

.

.

.