Tab Content
More Activity

3 Visitor Messages

  1. A piece of advice for anyone struggling with an oppressor or false dichotomy (being fooled into having 2 choices): Negotiate, or find a way to achieve a third option. Often in a situation, fighting back with raw force is actually useless. The situation might escalate, consuming your own resources. Or perhaps, you'll just be fighting against nothing and draining your own energy.

    I guess if you have no choice, you should probably fight back. I would take a defensive stance. Figure out where your standards are, and stick to them instead of going on the offensive. In cases where you have moral conflict, it'll help you, and in other cases it'll prevent you from looking bad to others. I think that revenge isn't necessarily a bad thing. I think that, even better, the threat of it gets your opposition to do what you want, or at least to negotiate.

    I would say that you should generally not give in to your oppressor, even if it promises anything ranging from happiness to peace.

    I also think that you shouldn't negotiate anything that isn't expendable in some way. Think about the life you want to live and the standards you have, and then give up the resources that aren't necessary for those. The revenge tool could be useful for this.
  2. Generally, if you think that being a certain type would be ideal or would fit what you want to be in life, you're probably that type or something similar to it anyway. It's a bad idea to try to artificially change yourself to be something else. It might seem like it could make you a better person, but you'll probably just become worse and lose competence in your favorite areas until you find a way to get back to normal.
  3. ESI 2w3 xxOAx Phlegmatic xxLV (likely EFLV). Consider whether people talking about their emotions make you bored.

    Popular and official-looking MBTI sites like 16personalities might be useful, since the average person is more likely to be exposed to it. Probably ignore MBTI cognitive functions descriptions.

    I'm fairly confident in my own Enneagram, and also pretty confident in my own Socionics type. Read my "About Me" if there's any confusion.

    If EFLV would work, there might also be a chance for ELVF. That might be a more admirable or interesting person. Someone who doesn't seem to have many weaknesses, and seems like an interesting conversation partner. If ELFV doesn't work, then EVLF or LFEV could work (radiance relations). Consider the dormancy of your own 3rd aspect (maybe over a long period of time).

    I'm generally more confident about EFLV than FELV. I also think that out of all of the Attitudinal Psyche choices listed above, EFLV would be the ideal choice.

    I'm not confident about my Attitudinal Psyche guesses in general. It relies on assumptions that I've made that aren't necessarily true.

    Consider So/Sx or Sp/Sx.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3
About Clarke

Basic Information

About Clarke
Biography:
I'm an INTJ or INFP RxOxI, probably RLOAI.

I fit ILI historically. My relationships with others that I've typed using cognitive function positions descriptions indicate that I have to be one. I'm kind of an emotional person, sometimes emotionally or irrationally driven, but I would generally say that I'm pretty bad at ethics.

I would generally say that I'm not moody, although I have worries that aren't usually rational. By some definitions, that would make me L. To others, I'm usually perceived as C.

I tend to admire people who have Socionics Se and logical or thinker characteristics. I say this because I like people who are impressive and/or powerful, and who seem to be good at thinking.

On sites like 16personalities, I think that I fit the ISTJ description. I would consider myself to be historically detail oriented and loyal to groups and systems, as well as someone who normally cares about integrity. I'm also bad at symbolism, but that seems to be because I have 3E in attitudinal psyche.

I would generally say that I fit Fe PoLR.

I defined myself as Sx/Sp earlier because I've historically used resources and physical assistance to fuel and preserve my deep intimate bonds. I think that there have been cases where I might have created deep personal bonds to serve my resources, and used my resources to serve a social cause. I don't think that this is standard behavior for me. I would generally say that it's more likely that I would dedicate myself to a social cause than try to establish myself in the social sphere using my resources. I'm not sure about this.

I think that the common descriptions for 6 Sp and 6 Sx can't be used to determine what I am. I've taken on both friendly and powerful/strong images, as well as a variety of other images.

I think that if I appear like an EII somehow, it might be because I might be an INFP in MBTI. My ideas and thoughts just aren't related to what seem to be spontaneous or random idea generation, or at least optimistic and static (still images) idea generation that I'd like to immediately talk about. It's possible that I might be misunderstanding the Socionics cognitive functions.
Gender:
Female
Sociotype:
6w5 ILI So-Last

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
90
Posts Per Day
3.34
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
3
Most Recent Message
Today 02:58 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 07:37 PM
Join Date
09-24-2022
Referrals
0

1 Friend

Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

10-21-2022


10-20-2022


10-19-2022


10-18-2022



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

10-21-2022


10-20-2022


10-19-2022


10-18-2022



Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast