She might've interpreted it as "this guy took the homes of 19 normal people and bulldozed them to make some money". Maybe she doesn't understand that...
For some reason, the story of Ebenezer Scrooge (I guess in the simpler versions) has always bothered me. It seems like a spirit took a functional man...
This actually makes alot of sense. I had a really great relationship with someone who I just debated with endlessly. I think that they were Alpha NT...
From my personal experience, the best way to catch an ILI is to seem very capable, especially in something that they're interested in. So if they're...
I mean demons probably need psychologists. Anything that torments living people on a daily basis probably needs some therapy or psycho-analysis, more...
I'm not the best at morality, but Ukrainians aren't his citizens. To him, it seems like they're basically an enemy that's in the way of his plans to...
I seem to fit some descriptions for the ILI historically. I have historically imagined plotlines and potential futures, and reflected on past events or bodies of information. I have also liked to understand how things work, and have not really liked to deal with relationships or people. However, I also seem to historically fit the EII ITR's (Intertype Relations) with people that I've typed through cognitive functions descriptions.
My imagination style is sort of like a movie. I play out a scene, usually a hypothetical scenario with things I’ve encountered. I usually have a low desire to talk about these imaginations with others.
I’m not sure that I fit the EII dichotomies. I think that I often change my plans (implies that I might be Irrational), although I don’t like to change plans that I’ve told other people about. I also don’t think that I like to be stuck in a period of consideration. Usually I like to make small decisions or plans, and then change them with new information or new insights. I think that what I do could be considered consideration (I usually tell people that I’d like to think about the decision), but I usually don’t consciously think about the decision. Occasionally, when things are quiet, I’ll automatically think about it and then get an insight.
I would say that I generally value logic over ethics. I actually have a fairly low care for ethics, and mine tend to be adaptable based on my obligations, my loyalties, or whichever power seems to make the most sense. I generally don’t think that I have much confidence in my own ethical systems, but I generally tend to understand that certain things seem right or wrong. I think that I don’t always make strong judgements about people that others consider to be unethical. There are people that I would call “manipulative” or “exploitive” in principle, but I don’t feel any ill will towards them. Many times, I don’t feel any desire to correct the “manipulative” or “exploitive” situations. Despite this, I generally think that I try to be a good person. Often times, I do things that I think are morally sound, only to have someone complain about the morality of the actions. I generally have taken an approach to life that people who complain about the morality of actions without a good justification simply don’t make sense.
On 16personalities, I would generally say that I fit the ISTJ or the INFP description. I have historically liked order, details, and integrity. Despite this, I’m generally a slacker, and I’m often a creative person who seems to understand others.
I think that I tend to be attracted to people who appear to be capable. Logic seems to be important, but they don’t necessarily need to be smarter than me. Though, I tend to think that people who are smarter than me are also very interesting.