Luminous Lynx
To Stand As The Oak

Right on. We should speak more candidly.

woah awesome he defo looks xIE. i would go LIE over EIE but as im not that familiar w/ him i cant be sure. i watched an interview and yeah, vibes super LIE, not sure about DCNH subtype, maaaybe D/N? i wanna say D. tho, if you initially confused him for ILI then C may be a possibility, ive noticed Cs tend to resemble their mirrors often (or C extroverts seem a bit more introverted/ambiverted and vice-versa) also what you said re: extreme individuality Cs are supposedly the most 'offbeat'/eccentric representatives of their type/s

tyty for introducing me <3

Hey Lynx, Thank you for posting more music on my visitor messages, I really liked the blends of soothing energy they were~ I even saved them to my music so I could listen to them later

Love the ethereal vibe of this

underrated devin masterpiece imo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvn0gqzh_-4

not a song but, reminded me of you lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaXmIPHrHmY

<3 <3 <3 one of my all time fav songs, you know me well

doin pretty good, trying to stay on top of my new years resolutions hbu?

<3 song

type update: yeah i think ESI, tho sometimes i have doubts.. but no one is a perfect example of their type ig. when i joined the forum in 2016 i was totally convinced i was EII, but for like the past year ive slowly been changing my mind. sometimes ive gone back on EII just b/c its familiar and whatever, but if i were being totally honest i dont feel its accurate. i grew up in a rly delta household so i think that mightve contributed to my type confusion

a lot of people type me ILI but. i rly dont think thats right LoL (im weird but not as weird as the ILIs ive known) tho i get it... i self type as H (dcnh) which accentuates intro-irrational fxns iirc + gives an Ip impression

and ty~ holidays were fun this year, had a blast

lol Christ I'm passive aggressive. I just handed out an apology to your friend as well, fwiw.

I agree that it's a credit to Socionics that their theorists have come up with criteria and explanations where MBTI theorists have not. HP cognition is cool - sbbds has it in spades. You notice the way she debates? She sees the whole picture, so she can parse out what's "behind the scenes", whether it's the subtext of an argument or the intentions of the person making the argument. It's useful for IEI because when IEI and SLE interact, IEI chugs through the experimental process I mentioned earlier and SLE sees all the results, picks out the relevant bits, and the process continues, averting both an overload of information and a deficiency in information. I'm not completely shy of doing the HP thing, but mostly it's about developing causal explanations for how things work. It is nice that Socionics, as it stands, has criteria that allows users to get to the bottom of whether they're introverted or extraverted in a way that MBTI does not. Socionics has a lot of detailed material to make deductions from, which is useful because the Forer effect more greatly influences the typing process the more vague descriptions are.