I mean, if I’m very honest, people here are unlikely to offer accurate insights of your type, because they are using surface observing models, like
Braingel Yesterday, 11:50 PMAnother such LII is Sephiroth from FF7. He's actually the same archetype as Mr. Spock, and is the only such character present in the Millennial generation
HolyKnowing Yesterday, 10:45 PMSo far the only thing that seems okay with me being ESI is parts of Fe ignoring
However, I don't really get immersed in other people
how can you even compete with an autistic Ni base perfectionist like this one
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ac-pvfZli8Y
who
I was gonna add myself but the spreadsheet gatekeeper @DirectorAbbie has been MIA in for so long.
Someone should revive this, or make a
ESIs seem much bolder in imposing their morals, feelings and will compared to me, and more interested in and defending societal moral issues , the description
Squirrel Yesterday, 10:14 PMI would agree with that , especially if 4 Sides of mind theory is included with it , but I personally prefer Socionics, I'm not willing to study people
Squirrel Yesterday, 10:14 PMJohn Beebe is arguably more accurate than SCS for a very traumatized and unhealthy person. Their ignoring function isn’t neurotic, but as I was
Braingel Yesterday, 09:58 PMI noticed that while I was reading, actually I sometimes need to read the same description more than once in order to understand what's written more
Squirrel Yesterday, 09:53 PM
Thoughts about my type
I only understand scs by my intuition and fill-ins of it.. If you want a guess of what your true type is, look for a guy in the scs circle named Capitan..
Braingel Yesterday, 11:58 PM