Yes, we disagree here. I think claiming Ne/Si valuers are DCNH NH is simply a crutch for explaining away a typing method with major problems. Your definition
Northstar Today, 04:50 PMThank you but why ?
This sounds so strange
Btw is there a way to remove the like to replace it with constructive ?
Yeah, I think his typing approach has some major issues and while his book was entertaining, I don't think his typing methodology is interesting enough
Northstar Today, 04:47 PMI think they have psychic energy (though not necessarily motivation) to take more extreme positions and opinions than peripheral types. Centrals may disagree
ipbanned Today, 04:36 PMlmao he is MUCH better than that guy. But the funny thing is, they both have the same real first name lol.
Shazaam Today, 04:28 PMAhhh ok. He genuinely sounds like a better fit than your ex-con SLE ex. For your musings and thought exploration, you can stick around here with
Oh shit you're really gonna ask an overly ambivalent IEI this question? xD I have no idea what I really want, that's the problem. I think I want the same
Shazaam Today, 04:19 PMOn the plus side, if a LSI really likes you and trusts you, they can be incredibly loyal, consistent, and steadfast. The POLR Ne is a trade off.
Gulenko's typings of forum members AKA Big G SquaD
Yes, I did actually study them, both out of curiosity and as part of my technical university education. I don't agree, I think it's a popular misconception
Northstar Today, 05:02 PM