Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
Ne is ok in a casual setting for example if it's for humor. Otherwise, from ILE I can tolerate it but from IEE I have a more internally hostile reaction
chocolatte Today, 01:23 PM[MENTION=16324]thistle[/MENTION] I personally have three most plausible types (LIE, ILI & ILE, with ILE not fitting intertype relations at all).
RBRS Today, 12:17 PMThere's no candy I've tried that I don't like tbh. Some cheap chocolate like the hollowed out chocolate Easter bunny's they have for the holiday taste
SlytherinPower Today, 12:08 PMDo you mean the pictured (ILE) is always your leading type when you take this test?
In the socionics elements profile I'm guessing you scored
Point is: Person needs a way to release ignoring if not they become disoriented - role helps here. LSE who gets anal about rules is one such example or
BrightDemonSheep96 Today, 10:22 AM conveying facts and information about things gets annoying fast when they aren't related to or organized into a specific logical structure.
Ode to Dual Contact & 8 Stages of Dual Relations by Grigori Shulman
Grigori A. Shulman
International Institute of Socionics
Publication "Undiscovered Worlds", No 3, 2001
See also:
Wikisocion - Duality relations
Wikisocion - Duality Stories and Observations
8 Steps of Duality in Alpha Quadrant
Stages of Duality
Dual contact, dual relations, relationships of duality, relationship of complete mutual complementarity ... All of these phrases describe the same intertype relation, which constitutes the essence of discovery made by A. Augusta that paved the way to the amazing concept of socionics.
Indeed, when you're observing a dual pair, an impression arises, as A. Augusta writes, that in front of your eyes is a separated androgenous pair - so organic, natural, and comfortable... read more
Categories:
Intertype Relations