Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
@VewyScawwyNawcissist
@ipbanned
I would like to add that I would not entertain extraverted sociotypes. When you suggest them I will simply
@ipbanned
Nietzsche is more than likely LSI, as well as Evola. Hegel is an Alpha NT the same as Marx. Likely LII. Schopenhauer or Voltaire I don't
Amber Heard - IEI-N, Depp is an IEI-C. incompatible subtypes. dunno where Se base comes from.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-Qrab_QYzQ
one's DCNH description of harmonizing subtypes is pretty excellent. I like about them that I don't have to argue or explain much, they will just go along
Alive Today, 02:01 PMI do think your type is some beta type, but more likely rational than irrational. EIE is possible. Possibly a normalizing subtype.
EIE-N
@VewyScawwyNawcissist
I don't know how it is which I am 'acting', or how I think I'm 'getting away' with it.
I act here the way I act in familiar
5. to put it simply, your "core" temperament does not change because it's in direct correlation with your Type. e.g. An EIE will always belong
godslave Today, 12:46 PM
None's Type
[MENTION=17467]None[/MENTION]
ipbanned Today, 02:24 PMFrom the SHS standpoint from which I mostly operate, most philosophers are EIEs. There are a few exceptions