Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
Something I forgot to say : even though interaction with IxEs is good and even interesting, I sometimes don't understand what are they talking and I need
Squirrel Today, 07:28 PMtbh I just deal better with those who don't cause me headache
Sol was annoying, not because he was " objective " - he actually
https://classicsocionics.wordpress.c...ng-of-symbols/
Ne is latent/potential energy here and Ni clealry about "time"
Hello! You can call me Aiden or Colt, either one is fine with me. I'm from the state of Alaska . I am 17 years of age and a Sagittarius. I really
VisstStykke Today, 07:05 PMmaybe he is Ni-HTELSD-IEI-Fe-xyz who knows really. to the dream and back... as you say.
on a peaceful hiatus Today, 06:47 PMI saw the aushra descriptions in that other thread by Muir’s it generally seems in line with whatever is socionics today
and I would
By being an autistic Si base perfectionist (this phrase describes me quite well actually...), so maybe not competing in the same league... or we do? I
qaz00 Today, 06:41 PMThe Ne in Aushura is also more like modern Ni “internal content and essence”.
Braingel Today, 06:39 PMWell, it’s more that Aushura’s EII is a lot different than a modern socio one.. There’s the mental/vital track, so an EII has mental
Braingel Today, 06:32 PM
My case for SCS and John Beebe in a highly traumatized person
Well, what has a huge role in me being an eii in classical is that I have vital, not mental Fe, and a TiSe super ego:
Braingel Today, 07:52 PMhttps://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...47d6beb3318c0&