Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
I have some bias toward him because of that shit Twilight
EIE or ESI I guess...?
I see, in my own recent actions, several manifestations of what has been described in texts as "unhealthy Sx" dynamics. It's all just distractions,
Cat Lady Today, 03:57 AMI said preferences, not standards. I don't expect to find all of that in one guy.
Dreymagine Today, 03:50 AMIsn't that like Simon Sinek's whole shtick? Lol. He does it for like the first 10 minutes, and probably more, in this video: https://youtu.be/QKG4v0oKXRw
hellohellohello Today, 03:47 AMJung and Socionics have nothing to do with Sinek and his work. Sinek is "systemizing" people? The sky is yellow, then.
Park Today, 03:38 AMI think I probably need to date a good psychologist in order to be with someone who meets my mental health standards. I am dead serious. I want someone
Cat Lady Today, 03:38 AMIt has everything to do with being an ethical or a logical type? "If I've ever read Socionics at all" lol ok.
FDG's explanation
That has nothing to do with being a logical type. He also speaks about having trouble grokking difficult logical concepts and being dismissive of (and
Park Today, 03:21 AMLSI-D for him is unlikely and LSI also unlikely I think. I've now seen enough footage of him to recognize him in similar men. People like Haaland are
Rusal Today, 03:09 AM
Adventures in Dating
Katherine Fauvre was right about what? Link?
Adam Strange Today, 04:25 AM