Conversation Between Korpsy Knievel and The Ineffable

3 Visitor Messages

  1. Then let these "some people" speak for themselves. In all other cases you commit the same errors you accuse me of and thus have no valid basis for complaint.
  2. The only true argument you make may be considered the one regarding "mob appeal" when I sad "basically everyone". That was exaggeration from my part, though I was needing a solution to express the *actual* fact that quite some people expressed this about you and that I suspect probably all observed. What you do is obvious and you also acknowledged yourself your competition with Ashton and Timmy in this, IIRC. So please spare me of this theory of peeing.
  3. My post was not directed at you as much as at people who get misguided by such claims in general.

    Moving goalposts. Your post began with my name and an insidious cabal of like-minded ne'er-do-wells.

    I'm also exemplifying with my IRL examples, I may have mistyped, I may want to push my opinion too

    So you admit you've got no moral leg to stand on.

    however IMO you have a contrarian mindset

    Negativity bias.

    basically everyone who dealt with you on this forum knows.

    Mob appeal. Also false.

    You're using this "I know IRL people who do/don't do that" just because you can, and because no one can prove you wrong.

    Faulty inference/appeal to ignorance.

    However you can't prove they're true as well, such arguments won't go above the status of possibility without a tangible backup.

    So how is that different from 99% of the other opinions thrown around here? Very little is ever proven conclusively on this forum other than that words are on a screen or that a link goes to the appropriate webpage.

    Here's another example: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...166#post780166 Does that bare assertion make it true?

    Fatuous question.

    I could have come and state I know 27 NFs using neti pot. Total bluff.

    Ignoratio elenchi.

    Considering that most of the time you don't have reasonable arguments, you have a relativistic view on truthfulness, you like to argue and misrepresent people for fun, we have all the reasons to believe this is yet another bluff of yours.

    Hypocrisy, hypocrisy, hypocrisy, popular appeal.

    For your IRL examples to weight anything, you need to prove reasonableness, understanding and honesty first.

    I'll accept your criticisms when they're no longer made in bad faith. Until then, tally ho!
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3