The song is not bad, I usually listen to rock, but it's pretty good for that type of music.
Might be your kind of song. Thoughts?
My current theory on why people find my "awkward" is sort of like how college students hate Barney. They're just not part of the target audience, hence why it seems clumsy or "awkward", when in reality I fit in quite naturally to groups and can very easily get people to laugh or get swept up in a current of enthusiasm or whatever. One thing you'll notice is other Alphas consistently type me as an Alpha SF. Why is it that that group is the only group that consistently thinks that? My theory is one explanation, but it could be a sign that they're the only group where my Fe HA goes over. It could even be something else altogether, like the fact that being an over-the-top eccentric is what I've been encouraged to be basically my whole life, because people eat it up and can't get enough. You can't deny it doesn't work.
Well in my case I don't mind being tied down to things for the moment if I know that in the future I'll be able to do something more meaningful and exciting. I'm sure you can motivate yourself for other reasons than imagination. Fair enough on your thought about posts. However, you also seem ILE from your vids. You do give off lots of , but it seems a lot more goofy than natural. It seems like the kind of I would expect from an ILE rather than ESE imo.
Interesting. On the topic of possibilities, my understanding is that not only feels comfortable with possibilities, it needs them, and can't be "bound" or "tied down" to obligations or commitments, lest it lose its ability to pursue potential and the uncertain. This is not me. I honestly think my would fall in my DS, not my Creative. I feel quite happy binding myself, especially to a completely internally consistent standard (I'm currently trying to reconcile my spiritual beliefs with my approach to general knowledge; being internally inconsistent really bothers me). I've heard LIIs call their version their "theory of everything". I understand creative as being more loose and freeform than a Core Driving Motive, much like how I think 's sense of potential can be functional to a degree (how else do you motivate yourself, except with imagination?), and also good fun in of itself. I can't really find fault with how you understand the IMs though. Certainly if you were to just look at my posts ILE would be a reasonable conclusion. IMO anyone who's been in the game of Socionics, especially debating Socionics in a public forum, is going to start reflecting and .
for myself is just the ability to consider many possibilities as opposed to just being content with one or a few. I think you do this a lot in your posts without even knowing it, it's like you are completely surrounded by your that you don't even notice it. As for , I just see it as being able to logically prove that your ideas and thoughts are accurate. You do this quite often in most of your posts and you do an excellent job of it as well. I don't think this is being intelligent or being a good debater. I just see it as a being able to adequately explain your thoughts in a logical fashion. Perhaps this may make you appear more intelligent and can make you a better debater, but it's not a prerequisite.
"Yes, you strike me as ILE to the core, there is much and in your posts." I hear this a lot, and I think it comes from a shallow understanding of what and actually are. I'm not going to presume to know what you think though, so let's talk IMs. What do you see as being, what do you see as being? I'm just going to straight up say that I don't think being able to reason logically or produce an argument is the exclusive domain of , else I'm sure the majority of the highly intelligent users on this forum would be egos.
