Well I think niffweed put together the wiki, for the most part. Isha/aleesha owns the website? I think. Yeah and I don't think I'm an infantile either. I relate too much to being a victim. I don't know how good those categories are, but I think I have a good idea of the difference between a few types from reading socionics workshop and niffweed's celebrity list<- and user type list<- (<-click). I've been able to define alpha NTs, etc in real life, so I think I'm good. Seems to make sense. I've also really related to the idea of Fe-PoLR for a long time, thought of it before socionics back when I was in MBTI. When I came to Socionics, my first thought was "SOMEONE BEAT ME TO THIS!". Some people define Fe-PoLR differently though, and I actually don't relate as much to that sense of it, than I do the current sense, which makes the most sense to me, but I believe it is because they try to explain Fe-PoLR too abstractly. I personally think some people try to verify my type as something else, much too abstractly, like they can't even be realistic and show specific examples while explaining what they see and define the term clearly and descriptively, they instead say "oh no thats not what Fe is, its internal dynamics of objects and you don't seem Fe-PoLR, here's someone who is Fe-PoLR (chose random celebrity from ashton's typelist)." Some people don't have a very good grasp of this theory . Not saying ashton doesn't, I'm just saying other people don't appear to be getting anywhere and don't know how to think on their own. They remain in the abstract, use preexisting benchmarks and can't apply their understanding to the real world. I'm not too far off from that definition, but at least I try to understand the theory a bit more practically.
I didn't know about this Socionics Workshop thing. Would you mind to tell me who made it? Who are the responsibles for this website? And why do you prefer it than Wikisocion? It just made me curious. But I really disagree that you are an ILE, that's impossible, and I also disagree that you could be an EII, you don't behave like an infantile. You seem to have a high level of Ni, you're much more symbolic and introspective than any ILE could be. If you let me say so, you're much more affiliated to darkness than light.
I can feel the strongly depressive presence of Ni in you. And I cannot feel any Fe, you seem really Fe devaluing, it clearly seems to me to be your PoLR. Don't mind what other people say, you're ILI, that's for sure. Forget this thing of being an infantile, that's completely impossible, blatant nonsense. I really cannot see that in you. You cannot be an IEI either, you use too much Te, have you noticed that? You just did so on my chatbox.
HAHAHAHA, it seems ironical to me that you're not sure that you are an ILI, oh pal, c'moooooon, this is so obvious, your very existence screams "ILI" from every part of your being. Have you taken a close look to you signature? That's why I perceived the whole situation as ironical: "Unfortunately he _______ an INTp, and the hunter became the hunted. Those were the salad days, so to speak. Sad story, good taste." Can't you see the strong Ni shouting from this? The intense Ni as the raw material and then shaped by Te. And the repression of Fe is also really obvious.
I'm more sure of being a 4, although I wouldn't say I'm particularly certain about any of it. I lean toward being a 5w4 or 4w5 atm, and I also lean toward being an ILI, which is my original and most common self typing. I think I'll always come back to it no matter what, seeing my history. Some people type me EII, which I think is a step in the right direction. An interpretation of what an EII really is differs widely. Many people think I'm ILI, and some think I'm an ILE? Which is a bit odd. You should check out this resource if you haven't already Main Page - WSWiki I think the ILI one is great, and LII and others will use some work. There are IM descriptions at the bottom, that I like in terms of dominant function placement.
Hello, what are you most sure of: that you are an E4 or that you are an INFj? Regards.
