Warlord looks INTj, actually. Any chance we can get a clear pic of your face?
Warlord [split from Official Members Picture Thread]
Warlord looks INTj, actually. Any chance we can get a clear pic of your face?
-
It's Binky bitch.
See not the unsmiling lips and icy eyes,
And hear not the silence after.
Look instead as the mime hypnotizes
And listen to the laughter.
I don't look like TiNe's at all.Originally Posted by Binky
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
OMG Yes, you do.
It's Binky bitch.
See not the unsmiling lips and icy eyes,
And hear not the silence after.
Look instead as the mime hypnotizes
And listen to the laughter.
I don't look like TiNe's at all.
Right...
Respeck.
4w3-5w6-8w7
lol
I look lot more like:
Than:
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
that's hot.lol
lol yeah, they should give Larry King an award.
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
Warlord, please stay away from VI. ThanX.
It's Binky bitch.
See not the unsmiling lips and icy eyes,
And hear not the silence after.
Look instead as the mime hypnotizes
And listen to the laughter.
I think you're ILI warlord, but you also freak me out.
I think you're LII Warlord, but you also piss me off.
Lol and you're hilariously NOT Ip temperament.
Oh those stern, rigid Ij types...
Ya do know that INTp's look pretty dazed and confused right?
Thats called irrational introversion.
Larry King is a LIIzard.
The end is nigh
Are all socionix people, going for their shot at this lame campaign? We all know your position already. Nothing like "typing" people who disagree with you with different type than their self-typing, eh?
Well I'm not rigid at all in person, I'm not rigid in that picture either. It's a still picture. Even my head is tilted, because I'm not holding it straight. "Sterness" has not to do with IJ-temperament, Logos doesn't look stern at all in his picture, neither does Jimbean for example.
None of the people who are irrational introverts, look "dazed and confused" in their pictures on this thread. That's just stupid. Except maybe Bionicgoat lol. And my expression is really spaced-out/bored rather than stern.Ya do know that INTp's look pretty dazed and confused right?
Thats called irrational introversion.
Last edited by Warlord; 06-16-2009 at 11:08 PM.
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
fyp
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
hhahahahahahahahaa lol Warlord you're SUCH an LII!!!!
Don't be ashamed! lol The prospect's a much better one.
Wond'ring aloud, How we feel today. Last night sipped the sunset, My hand in her hair. We are our own saviours, As we start both our hearts, Beating life Into each other. ~Ian Anderson
Aren't you bit predictable?
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
GRR
Aren't you just as predictable for resorting to the recourse of, all socionix people type you differently than your self-typing when you disagree with them, as a means to somehow eliminate the dissonance you feel?
4w3-5w6-8w7
Can't point out Tom's predictability and what's going on, without actually doing it.
Of course it seems predictable, when my prediction is correct.
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
I think INTp-Te accounts for the J you're seeing
Yeah it could, and they're not really even seeing anything like that, they are just claiming it, without basis on reality.
Seems like I'm really getting in to them, that they even bother
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
Yeah. Just depends on when and how you point it out.
It seems predictable when it's done before any substantial accusation is made, or when you've already attempted other retorts that lacked efficacy -- then it seems like a cop-out.Of course it seems predictable, when my prediction is correct.
Sigh. Assumption of the latent causal dynamic going on in a situation. Nice Fe polr.Seems like I'm really getting in to them, that they even bother
4w3-5w6-8w7
ugh. I'm a socionix person and I think that Warlord is ILI (and model-A makes sense to me). end of story.
"It's called perspicacity, not Fe."
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
I'm not seeing "j", I'm seeing Ij/Ep, which is totally separate from Ip/Ej, which Warlord, sadly, is not. He's a static type.
If you think you VI more like FDG than Larry King, you're either blind or stupid. Ti INTj suits you well, but I won't continue to debate it with you if you won't listen. I'm glad you "know my opinion", all the same.
And yes, my reaction was, likely, very predictable; I do tend to try pointing out the obvious (to me) to people who don't see what I'm seeing/agree with me with the occasional joke once I've realized they won't continue to think my argument is correct. I think the occasional reminder is better than letting the situation lie, especially if it will create laughter or make that person think about the disagreement in a new, fresh light.
But I won't joke at you if it hurts yourelings.
Wond'ring aloud, How we feel today. Last night sipped the sunset, My hand in her hair. We are our own saviours, As we start both our hearts, Beating life Into each other. ~Ian Anderson
Sigh. Disenfranchisement of the apparent verbal context engaging in a time-relevant interface. Nice stoking of the dragon.
Why is making an "assumption of the latent causal dynamic going on in a situation" not applicable to INTp types? Or indeed Ni-Ego types in general or...many types in fact. Is it because INTps can 'predict' what's happening with 100% certainity?
Fair enough
Because Fe-polrs don't care about "you're doing this action because of this, which means this" -- that style of causal understanding is Fe's realm. Te is the anti-thesis of that.
4w3-5w6-8w7
Or the antithesis, even.
I think joining the military has left your once exuberant vocabulary, sadly, in decline.
You should quit! lol
Wond'ring aloud, How we feel today. Last night sipped the sunset, My hand in her hair. We are our own saviours, As we start both our hearts, Beating life Into each other. ~Ian Anderson
You tellin me baby face nick joined the military?Or the antithesis, even.
I think joining the military has left your once exuberant vocabulary, sadly, in decline.
You should quit! lol
What makes you think that Warlord cares?Fair enough
Because Fe-polrs don't care about "you're doing this action because of this, which means this" -- that style of causal understanding is Fe's realm. Te is the anti-thesis of that.
Your interpretation of this quote is that it shows Fe-valuing...but if it is simply correct, would you then think it was a Te statement?Yeah it could, and they're not really even seeing anything like that, they are just claiming it, without basis on reality.
Seems like I'm really getting in to them, that they even bother
And why would you use the phrase "Assumption of the latent causal dynamic going on in a situation" when it doesn't apply to just Fe?
Do you think Warlord VIs more like FDG than Larry King btw? I don't believe you said. If not, why do you have to make latent casaul assumptions about Warlord?
I'm out, bitchOr the antithesis, even.
I think joining the military has left your once exuberant vocabulary, sadly, in decline.
You should quit! lol
Or should I say, I was spurned by the peremptory assholes, in a sense, extricating myself furtively in a speciously legal manner, but insidiously timing my actions, conducting the assiduous efforts of insipid fools, ultimately flying the fuck free
blah blah
Yeah. Little Nicky, all trapped with those meanies. It's why I left; they're insensitive
He's been responding. No one's claiming it affects him personally.
I was looking at it more from the way he went about things, rather than the actual statement (this is also viewed in a context I've established of his behavior over time). Perhaps I was being too "Fe" in my assumption of his motives. And the statement's correctness has no bearing on the functions IMO.Your interpretation of this quote is that it shows Fe-valuing...but if it is simply correct, would you then think it was a Te statement?
Because that's what I was alluding to, and don't expect people to take general, truncated phrases like that literally (because a lot is implicit to me), or misconstrue them to apply to other contexts than that which they are being referenced in.And why would you use the phrase "Assumption of the latent causal dynamic going on in a situation" when it doesn't apply to just Fe?
4w3-5w6-8w7
Well, I obviously don't think I'm either stupid or blind, so what do you think, genius? And I believe that's what's called "mocking someone", oh Bright One.
EpicI'm out, bitch
Or should I say, I was spurned by the peremptory assholes, in a sense, extricating myself furtively in a speciously legal manner, but insidiously timing my actions, conducting the assiduous efforts of insipid fools, ultimately flying the fuck free
Wond'ring aloud, How we feel today. Last night sipped the sunset, My hand in her hair. We are our own saviours, As we start both our hearts, Beating life Into each other. ~Ian Anderson
But you said that he doesn't have a Fe-PoLR in regards to this statement:
But if he doesn't care, then why would this necessarily be applicable?:Seems like I'm really getting in to them, that they even bother
He said that you and others kept posting in response to him "without basis in reality", and hence "Seems like I'm really getting in to them, that they even bother". Should it be argued that that Tom values Fe because he uses "you're doing this action because of this, which means this" style reasoning? (i.e. "If you think you VI more like FDG than Larry King, you're either blind or stupid.").
When you are using a phrase like "Assumption of the latent causal dynamic going on in a situation" to 'prove' that something is Fe-PoLR, it would be wise if the phrase wasn't something which seems like the words are perfectly succinct to describe perfectly what you mean to describe, when in actual fact being so vague as to be applicable to many functions and to not actually support the point you are trying to make.
I believe you are mocking me now when you say "oh Bright One". But how was it obvious that you obviously don't think you are either stupid or blind? Am I somehow supposed to know your mind? Do you often second-guess the mental states of others btw?
Yep.
By "care about" I meant that they are simply unaware to, or unconcerned with that style of processing peoples' motivations. He could care about the situation; no one knows for sure.But if he doesn't care, then why would this necessarily be applicable?:
Are you forgetting that he was making that claim -without basis in reality- himself? Little did he, or perhaps you as well, consider that there was a basis in reality which we were speaking from; the delivery was just mocking or whatever because of the nature of the situation.He said that you and others kept posting in response to him "without basis in reality",
*Hence*
The same statement could apply to him, because the situation could be just as easily construed that we were speaking from a solid basis in reality and he kept defending against us without any basis of reality to generate a defense from for whatever reason and thus that we were really getting to him that he would even bother.and hence "Seems like I'm really getting in to them, that they even bother".
That statement is one of logical exclusion, and has nothing to do with the nature of information processing I alluded to, in regards to Fe.Should it be argued that that Tom values Fe because he uses "you're doing this action because of this, which means this" style reasoning? (i.e. "If you think you VI more like FDG than Larry King, you're either blind or stupid.").
Point duly noted.When you are using a phrase like "Assumption of the latent causal dynamic going on in a situation" to 'prove' that something is Fe-PoLR, it would be wise if the phrase wasn't something which seems like the words are perfectly succinct to describe perfectly what you mean to describe, when in actual fact being so vague as to be applicable to many functions and to not actually support the point you are trying to make.
4w3-5w6-8w7
I know lot better what I look like, than you do.
I don't look anything at all like Larry King: shape of my head, forehead (LK has backwards slating, mine goes straight up), cheeks (LK has prominent cheekbones, I don't), jaw (LK has wide square shaped that goes way back. Mine's round, oval, narrow, small), nose (LK has downward pointing long straight nose. Mine points upwards), mouth (LK has underbite, protruding lowerlip, paperthin upperlip. I have overbite and thick lips), eyes (mine are bigger) and ears are totally different than his. In practice that's all possible parts of the head, none of them are similar.
If I look so much different from FDG, can you describe what actual physical differences I have compared to him. All I can say is different hairstyle, and that my upperlip is more in front than FDG's.
Last edited by Warlord; 06-17-2009 at 11:50 AM.
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
This is actually quite interesting I think. Many of the VI proponents argue that VI'ing has nothing to do with the shape of ones nose etc, that the key to VI'ing is in the gaze.
I'd like to know therefore how people are VI'ing Warlord when he has sunglasses on, VI'ing so confidently too. Perhaps this will shed some light on what exactly constitues VI'ing and if at least some of the people who regularly practice it here are full of shit.
yes, I always saw that as a typical ILI trait. I have it too. I think John Travolta also.
Anyways, when I read a true LII posts, they usually make little sense to me, I cannot understand their language. I've never had this problem with Warlord. Never doubted ILI for him. And he's a logical subtype looking at his direct, straightforward and effecient usage of words, instead of the more evolved, colored and flowing lingo style of intuitive subtypes, which crazedrat (-ni) is a good example of.
Perhaps if it's to do with the eye area, we have to conclude he's the same type as Stevie Wonder.
I'd accept "if you were a girl, you would look like Megan Fox", over Larry King anydayOf course, none of this really matters because it's quite evident that Warlord is the same type as Megan Fox. Thus Warlord is likely a similar type to Renee Zellweger who is also the same type as Simon Cowell. See?
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
Warlord: VI has nothing to do with actual facial features. It's about the eyes and overall energy emitted from the person. The eyes tell a lot...
Yeah. I'd say it's the most important aspect. What the fuck else are you gonna look at, you know? The eyes sort of give a context to the rest of the person's physical presence.
4w3-5w6-8w7
Reply With Quote
