Originally Posted by M
I'm uber busy, and on top of that I do not really know that much about socionics. I linked him with a few articles from socionics.
What would you say in response to that question
Someone asked me this, how would you respond?
I'm uber busy, and on top of that I do not really know that much about socionics. I linked him with a few articles from socionics.
What would you say in response to that question
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Lyricist is emotional and unworldly, Critic is critical and afraid of emotions.
www.socioniko.net is no longer my site.
You did it again, circus freak.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
First of all, are you talking from a Socionics or MBTI perspective here? I will answer this question from a Socionics perspective:
I think that in more extreme representatives of these types, the basic tenet of their Ni is a vision of a perfect world (of which they are, of course, the reference framework). How this perfect world looks, is decided by their creative function, which is either Fe or Te, meaning that IEIs seek a world where perfection revolves around people being in friendly relationships, and ILIs seek a world of technical perfection and competence.
EDIT TO ADD: the description above might seem to generic and prone to Forer effect, so let me give an example to make it more clear that the description applies to leading Ni types:
All types have a view of a perfect world, but each type has a different manifestation of that perfect world: where leading Ni types have a clear, singular, but intuitive vision of reality, leading Ne appreciate the pluralistic nature of reality, meaning that their view of a perfect world can change from moment to moment, or even from person to person.
The view of reality in leading Ti types is typically defined by a logically thought through system (as in systems theory), meaning their view of reality is rationally constructed, as opposed to the view leading Ni types have, which is a matter of closing their eyes and simply 'seeing' the picture.
Does this make sense?
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Why on earth was this de-earthed. It's an entirely useless thread. Isn't it the product of UDP III, or the original UDP (UDP II is still referred to as that, I believe)?
Yeah, exactly. Ask the clown who did it.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
jxrtes is an odd one. He used to be pretty witty and cool. Now he seems to have descended into strange madness.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote