I think I might be ILE

[Fabelie]

Hey guys, after re-reading a few of the type descriptions and having some of my close friends who know nothing about socionics read them, I'm starting to think I'm ILE.

Opinions would be wonderful.

Thank you!

[Galen]

I wouldn't believe it.

First of all, I wouldn't put great stock in type descriptions. The best that a type description can do is provide analysis of IEs and functions, but once they start describing behavior you should stop listening. You'd really be better off just learning the informational elements.

Second, from what I recall in your VI thread you seem very alpha SF, perhaps ISFp. ENTps don't have the sort of soft amiability that you seem to project naturally.

[Timeless]

*insert witty response here*

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[MatthewZ]

If I can't be ILE, neither can you.

[Galen]

Actually you know what, I'm not gonna defend that first part about type descriptions. Omit it as you see fit

[Fabelie]

I wouldn't believe it.

First of all, I wouldn't put great stock in type descriptions. The best that a type description can do is provide analysis of IEs and functions, but once they start describing behavior you should stop listening. You'd really be better off just learning the informational elements.

Second, from what I recall in your VI thread you seem very alpha SF, perhaps ISFp. ENTps don't have the sort of soft amiability that you seem to project naturally.

see my problem is that I see the information elements, and then confuse what I do and what I value. It surprises me that you think of me as "soft" because I've never been described that way before, but I'll take your word for it.

[Galen]

see my problem is that I see the information elements, and then confuse what I do and what I value. It surprises me that you think of me as "soft" because I've never been described that way before, but I'll take your word for it.

Well you may or may not be, but that's the impression I get of you that comes across in your photos. Maybe 'nice' is a better, albeit less eloquent or descriptive way of describing this impression

[Fabelie]

Well you may or may not be, but that's the impression I get of you that comes across in your photos. Maybe 'nice' is a better, albeit less eloquent or descriptive way of describing this impression

aw thanks

[Jarno]

Second, from what I recall in your VI thread you seem very alpha SF, perhaps ISFp. ENTps don't have the sort of soft amiability that you seem to project naturally.

I can say the same about her avatar :-)

[The Exception]

If I can't be ILE, neither can you.

No, but you and Fabelie could be honorary ILEs.

[stanprollyright]

Opinions would be wonderful.

You're SEI. Semi-duality is better than Kindred anyway

[Fabelie]

You're SEI. Semi-duality is better than Kindred anyway

See, I don't think I'm SEI, we bicker too much to be semi-duals.